Nietzsches tover | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 113 Number 4
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244

Abstract

Abstract

For a long time, Nietzsche was considered by his contemporaries primarily as a literary man. In philosophy and theology, the death of God nevertheless found resonance in the secularization debate. In this article I take a different path and will introduce a similar autopsy in the dis-re-enchantment debate. To this end, I revert mainly to the literary metaphors in Nietzsche’s work, of course without ignoring its philosophical (and theological) value. First, I retranslate some echoes of Nietzsche’s word from the secularization debate into the disenchantment debate. Here I note that this retranslation requires a shift from cultural to personal history. This provides me with two new, unexpected echoes of Nietzsche’s word. It also places radical questions on the current disenchantment debate.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2021.4.006.VANB
2022-01-01
2024-05-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/00025275/113/4/06_ANTW2021.4_VANB.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2021.4.006.VANB&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bennett, J.(2001), The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics, Princeton NY: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruce, S.(2002)God is dead. Secularization in the west. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gane, N.(2002), Max Weber and Postmodern Theory. Rationalisation versus re-enchantment, New York: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gauchet, M.(1985), Le désenchantement du monde, Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gordon, Peter E.(2008), The Place of the Sacred in the Absence of God: Charles Taylor’s A Secular Age, Journal of the History of Ideas69, pp. 647-673.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Josephson-Storm, J.(2017), The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences, Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jullien, F.(2017), Une seconde vie, Paris: Éditions Grasset. Vertaald door Van Beeck, Eve (2019): Het leven kan anders, Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Lontano.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kearney, R.(1988), Paul Ricoeur and the hermeneutic imagination, Dublin: University College. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F019145378801400202
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Latour, B.(2006), Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique, Paris: Editions La découverte.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lyons, S.(2014), ‘The Disenchantment/Re-enchantment of the World: Aesthetics, Secularization, and the Gods of Greece from Friedrich Schiller to Walter Pater’ in: The Modern Language Review109, pp. 873-895.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. McPherson, David(2013), Re-enchanting the World. An Examination of Ethics, Religion, and Their Relationship in the Work of Charles Taylor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (dissertatie Marquette University).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nietzsche, F.(1882)Die fröhliche Wissenschaft (‘la gaya Scienza’), Chemnitz: Ernst Smeitzner; New York: E. Steige, §344.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Nietzsche, F.(1883), Also sprach Zarathustra in de Kritische Studienasugabe van Nietzsche (1999), uitgegeven door Giorgio Colli en Mazzino Montinari, Band 4, München/Berlin: DTV/De Gruyter: p. 319.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nietzsche, F.(1888)Nachgelassene Fragmente 16, Munchen: Deutcher Taschenbug Verlag: p. 32.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ricœur, P.(1960), Finitude et culpabilité, Philosophie de la volonté, Paris: Aubier. p. 326.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ricoeur, P.(1963), La symbolique du mal, Paris: Editions du Seuil, p. 326.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. RicoeurP.(1979)‘The function of fiction in shaping reality’, in Man and World12, pp. 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01252461
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ricoeur, P.(1986), ‘La fonction herméneutique de la distanciation’ in Du texte à l’action. Essais d’hérmeneutique II, Paris: Editions du Seuil, p. 114.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ricoeur, P.(1998), Penser la bible (avec A. La Coque), Paris: Editions du Seuil, pp. 112-117.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Taylor, C.(2007), A Secular Age, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Van Tongeren, P(2012), Het Europese Nihilisme. Friedrich Nietzsche over een dreiging die niemand schijnt te deren, Nijmegen: Vantilt.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Van Tongeren, P.(2017), ‘Over het Nihilisme: Nietzsches Actualiteit of de onze’ in Tydskryf vir Geesteswetenskappe, 57, p. 59.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Weber, M.(1917), Wissenschaft als Beruf in Gesamtausgabe Band 17 von Mommsen, WolfgangJ. und Schluchter, Wolfgang (1992), Tübingen: Mohr.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Wohlfahrt, Günther(1991), Also Sprach Herakleitos. Heraklits B52 und Nietzsches Heraklit-Rezeption, Freiburg: Alber.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2021.4.006.VANB
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error