2004
Volume 116, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244

Abstract

Abstract

Our everyday language is drenched with terms and labels that refer to the social groups that are distinguished in our world. This influences the way we interact with ourselves and others. In this paper I discuss (1) how closely intertwined this labeling is with our nature as linguistic beings, what we should think (2) of our widespread and deeply entrenched inclination to socially categorize ourselves and others vis-a-vis (3) the harm it does according to an enormous amount of literature that has appeared in the past decades. In my discussion I steer clear of the heated discussion surrounding wokeness and the so-called culture wars, but discuss some of the tensions beneath it. My discussion is aimed at those who do not exactly know how to relate to the increased and omnipresent social categorisation in our daily practices, but would prefer to approach one another outside of those categories, aware of the potential harm it might do. I conclude with a short reflection on the notions of playfulness and symmetry, and how these might help us improve our attitude towards the other.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2024.2.002.SIE
2024-06-01
2024-10-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allport, G.W. (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernard, S., Proust, J. en Clément, F. (2015) Four- to six-year-old children’s sensitivity to reliability versus consensus in the endorsement of object labels. Child Development86(4), pp. 1112-1124. doi:10.1111/cdev.12366
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bessone, M. (2020) W.E.B. Du Bois and epistemic justice, Raisons politiques78(2), pp. 15-28
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell, B. en Manning, J. (2018) The Rise of Victimhood Culture: Microaggressions, Safe Spaces, and the New Culture Wars. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Carel, H. (2008) Illness: The Cry of the Flesh. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clément, F., Koenig, M. en Harris, P. (2004) The Ontogenesis of Trust, Mind&Language19(4), pp 360-79. doi:10.1111/j.0268-1064.2004.00263.x
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Clowes Huneke, S. (17september2023) Critically Cringe: On Susan Neiman’s “Left Is Not Woke”, Los Angeles Review of Books. Verkregen van https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/critically-cringe-on-susan-neimans-left-is-not-woke/
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cornelius, L.J. (oktober2022) Social Justice Weaponizing as a Form of Micro-Aggression, The New Social Worker. Verkregen van https://www.socialworker.com/feature-articles/practice/social-justice-weaponizing-form-of-micro-aggression/
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Crenshaw, K. (1989) Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics, University of Chicago Legal Forum, Vol. 1989, 1(8). Verkregen van http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dotson, K. (2011) Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing, Hypatia26(2), pp 236-257.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dros, L. (16april2021) Politieke correctheid maakt ons dom, Trouw. Verkregen van https://www.trouw.nl/religie-filosofie/politieke-correctheid-maakt-ons-dom~b0e25811/
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Du Bois, W.E.B. (1920) Of the ruling of men. In: Darkwater: Voices from within the Veil. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company, pp. 78-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. European Parliament (2022) State of play of academic freedom in the EU Member States. doi: 10.2861/466486
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fiske, S.T. (2017) Prejudices in Cultural Contexts: Shared Stereotypes (Gender, Age) versus Variable Stereotypes (Race, Ethnicity, Religion), Perspectives on Psychological Science12(5), pp. 791-799. doi:10.1177/1745691617708204
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fricker, M. (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Frye, M. (1983) The Politics of Reality. Essays in Feminist Theory. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gaynes, G. (30januari2020) How knitters got knotted in a purity spiral, Unherd. Verkregen van https://unherd.com/2020/01/cast-out-how-knitting-fell-into-a-purity-spiral/
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gelman, S.A. en Roberts, S.O. (2017) How Language Shapes the Cultural Inheritance of Categories, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114(30), pp. 7900-7907. doi:10.1073/pnas.1621073114
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gelman, S.A. en Wellman, H.M. (1991) Insides and Essences: Early Understandings of the Nonobvious, Cognition38(3), pp. 213-244.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Goffman, E. (1963) Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldstone, R.L., Kersten, A. en Cavalho, P.F. (2018) Categorization and concepts, in: S.Thompson-Schill (red.) Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Volume 3: Language and Thought, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1-43. doi:10.1002/9781119170174.epcn308
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Greene, J. (2013) Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hacking, I. (1998) Mad Travelers: Reflections on the Reality of Transient Mental Disease. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hacking, I. (17augustus2006) Making Up People, London Review of Books28(16). Verkregen van https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v28/n16/ian-hacking/making-up-people
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Harbin, A. (2016) Disorientation and Moral Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hartman, I. (28september2019) Cast off: how knitters turned nasty, The Spectator. Verkregen van https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/cast-off-how-knitters-turned-nasty/
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., en Ernst, D. (2000) Essentialist Beliefs About Social Categories, The British Journal of Social Psychology39(1), pp. 113-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hebdige, D. (1979) Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hingh, de (12augustus2023) Maak ruimte binnen de norm, De Volkrant. Verkregen van https://www.volkskrant.nl/kijkverder/v/2023/de-maatschappij-is-nog-steeds-bikkelhard-voor-iedereen-die-afwijkt-van-bestaande-gendernormen~v803918/?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
    [Google Scholar]
  30. HirschfeldL.A. (1996) Race in the Making: Cognition, Culture, and the Child’s Construction of Human Kinds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Langbert, M.Quain, A.J. en Klein, D.B. (2016) Faculty Voter Registration in Economics, History, Journalism, Law, and Psychology. Econ Journal Watch13(3), pp. 422-451.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Leshin, R.A., Leslie, S.-J. en Rhodes, M. (2021) Does It Matter How We Speak About Social Kinds? A Large, Preregistered, Online Experimental Study of How Language Shapes the Development of Essentialist Beliefs, Child Development92(4), pp. e531-e547.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lindholm, S.K. en Wickström, A. (2020) Looping Effects Related to Young People’s Mental Health: How Young People Transform the Meaning of Psychiatric Concepts, Global Studies of Childhood10(1), pp. 26-38. doi:10.1177/2043610619890058
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lugones, M. (1987) Playfulness, “World”-Travelling and Loving Perception, Hypathia2(2), pp. 3-19.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Leslie, S.J. (2015) “Hillary Clinton is the Only Man in the Obama Administration”: Dual Character Concepts, Generics, and Gender. Analytic Philosophy56(2), pp. 111-141. doi:10.1111/phib.12063
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Macrae, C.N. en Bodenhausen, G.V. (2000) Social Cognition: Thinking Categorically about Others, Annual Review of Psychology51, pp. 93-120.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Manne, K. (2017) Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Markus, N. (21juli2021) Het conflict met Quinsy Gario legt het geruzie bloot in Bij1, Trouw. Verkregen van https://www.trouw.nl/politiek/het-conflict-met-quinsy-gario-legt-het-geruzie-bloot-in-bij1~b46dee54/
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Mariën, F. (2022) Ik ben geen witte man. Brussel: ASP Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. McBryde Johnson, H. (16februari2003) Unspeakable Conversations, New York Times Magazine. Verkregen van http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/16/magazine/unspeakable-conversations.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Medin, D.L. en Ortony, A. (1989) Psychological essentialism. In: S.Vosniadou en A.Ortony (red.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179-195.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Mercier, Hugo (2020) Not Born Yesterday. The Science of Who We Trust and What We Believe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Moors, A. (3mei2023) EU-rapport over academische vrijheid in Nederland verwart politieke met wetenschappelijke diversiteit aan perspectieven, ScienceGuide. Verkregen van https://www.scienceguide.nl/2023/05/eu-rapport-over-academische-vrijheid-in-nederland-verwart-politieke-met-wetenschappelijke-diversiteit-aan-perspectieven/
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Neiman, S. (2023) Left is not Woke. Cambridge: Polity Press
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Nelson, J., Dunn, K. en Paradies, Y. (2021) Bystander Anti-Racism: A Review of the Literature, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy11(1), pp. 263-284. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01274.x
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Norris, P. en Inglehart, R. (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit and Authoritarian-Populism. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Pauli, W. (18augustus2020) Waarom journalist Walter Pauli geen ‘witte man’ genoemd wil worden, Knack. Verkregen van https://www.knack.be/nieuws/waarom-journalist-walter-pauli-geen-witte-man-genoemd-wil-worden/
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Radzik, L., Bennett, C., Pettigrove, G. en Sher, G. (2020) The Ethics of Social Punishment: The Enforcement of Morality in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge Core.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rees, H.R., Rivers, A.M. en Sherman, J.W. (2019) Implementation Intentions Reduce Implicit Stereotype Activation and Application, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin45(1), pp. 37-53. doi:10.1177/0146167218775695
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Rhodes, M. en Mandalaywala, T.M. (2017) The Development and Developmental Consequences of Social Essentialism, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science8(4). doi:10.1002/wcs.1437
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Rhodes, M. en Baron, A. (2019) The Development of Social Categorisation, Annual Review of Developmental Psychology 2019 December1, pp. 359-386. doi:10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-084824
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Roberts, S.O., Ho, A.K. en Gelman, S.A. (2017) Group Presence, Category Labels, and Generic Statements Influence Children to Treat Descriptive Group Regularities as Prescriptive, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology158, pp. 19-31. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.11.013
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Rustin, S. (30september2020). Feminists Like Me Aren’t Anti-Trans – We Just Can’t Discard the Idea of ‘Sex’, The Guardian. Verkregen van https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/30/feminists-anti-trans-idea-sex-gender-oppression
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Schinkel, W. en Reekum, R. van (2019) Theorie van de kraal: Kapitaal – Ras – Fascisme. Amsterdam: Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Sie, M. (2022) Moral Responsibility for Implicit Bias and The Impact of Social Categorization, In: Pereboom, D. en Nelkin, D., The Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 668-96.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Sie, M. (2018) Een reflectie op #metoo en de rol van onze morele sentimenten in desoriënterende tijden (Marjet van Loo, vert.), Filosofie en Praktijk39(2), pp. 23-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Sie, M. en Voorst Vader-Bours, N.M. van. (2016) Stereotypes and prejudices: Whose responsibility? Indirect personal responsibility for implicit bias, In: M.Brownstein en J.Saul (red.) Implicit Bias and Philosophy, Volume 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 90-114.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Smeehuijzen, J.L., Smids, J. en Hoekstra, C. (2023) Transgenderzorg aan kinderen: Juridische bedenkingen bij het Dutch Protocol (2018), Nederlands Juristenblad1772(25), pp. 2058-2069.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Smiley, M. (1992) Moral Responsibility and the Boundary of Community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Spears, R., Lea, M. en Lee, S. (1990) De-Individuation and Group Polarization in Computer-Mediated Communication, British Journal of Social Psychology29(2), pp. 121-134. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00893.x
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Srinivasan, A. (2018) The Aptness of Anger, Journal of Political Philosophy26(2), pp. 123-44. doi:10.1111/jopp.12130
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Sue, D. (2010) Micro-Aggressions in Everyday Life: Race Gender and Sexual Orientation. New York, NY: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Sunstein, C.R. (1999) The Law of Group Polarization, John M. Olin Program in Law & Economics Working Paper91.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Taylor, L. (2023) “Doe eens gewoon” Politics, Identity and the Academy. Tilburg Univerity. Verkregen van https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/71895737/inaugurale_rede_Linnet_Taylor_May_12_2023.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Taylor, C. (1994) Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Taylor, C. (2016) The Language Animal. The Full Shape of Human Linguistic Capacity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Belknap.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Valkenberg, S. (2021) Policor in de Polder. Amsterdam: Ambo Anthos.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Walker, M. (2007) Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Wekker, G. (2018) White Innocence: Paradoxes of Colonialism and Race. Harrogate: Combined Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Wever, B. de (2023) Over Woke. Gent: Borgerhoff & Lamberigts.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Weyns, W. (2020) Saboteren in plaats van redeneren, De Reactor. Verkregen van https://www.dereactor.org/teksten/theorie-van-de-kraal-saboteren-in-plaats-van-redeneren
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Weyns, W. (2021) Wie wat woke? Een cultuurkritische benadering van wat we (on) rechtvaardig vinden. Gent: Pelckmans uitgeverij.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Williams, J.P. (2007) Youth-Subcultural Studies: Sociological Traditions and Core Concepts, Sociology Compass1(2), pp. 572-593. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00043.x
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2024.2.002.SIE
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error