2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte
  4. Volume 116, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 116, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244

Abstract

Abstract

This paper investigates the phenomenological importance of anthropogenic climate change by focussing on the double meaning of ‘climate’, namely (1) average weather condition and (2) social mood or atmosphere (e.g. political climate). The relation between global heating and social mood or atmosphere is investigated through a rethinking of Martin Heidegger’s phenomenology of moods and Peter Sloterdijk’s elaboration of Heideggerian phenomenology into his philosophy of spheres. Guided by Heidegger’s insight into the world disclosing function of moods, especially existential anxiety, we investigate whether climate anxiety has a similar disclosing function. We argue that climate anxiety involves an ecological world disclosure. We then turn to Sloterdijk’s elaboration of Heidegger’s phenomenology of moods into a wide-ranging theory of intersubjective attunement and life-world constitution in intersubjective ‘spheres’. Sloterdijk speaks of an intraspheric ‘greenhouse effect’, meaning that both the physical and the social climate within a sphere must be adequate for interhuman development. We argue that the catastrophic effects of runaway global heating threaten this intraspheric greenhouse effect, causing a fundamental increase in interhuman conflictuality. Finally, this paper also engages critically with Vincent Blok’s post-phenomenological, speculative ecology of the ‘earth in itself’ as necessitated by the disruptive event of climate change. Contra Blok it is argued that phenomenology is capable of uncovering the philosophical meaning of climate change, especially given the internal connection between climate as meteorological phenomenon and climate as world disclosing mood.

© Peter Sas
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2024.3.008.SAS
2024-09-01
2024-10-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, C.A. (2001) Heat and violence, Current Directions in Psychological Science, volume 10, issue 1, pp. 33-38.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Apel, K-O. (1989) Sinnkonstitution und Geltungsrechtfertigung: Heidegger und das Problem der Transzendentalphilosophie, in: Rohs, P. (red.) (1989) Martin Heidegger: Innen- und Aussenansichten, pp. 131-175. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Blok, V. (2022) Van wereld naar aarde: Filosofische ecologie van een bedreigde planeet. Amsterdam: Boom.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Buber, M. (1948) Das Problem des Menschen. Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Schneider.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Caputo, J.D. (2018) Hermeneutics: Facts and Interpretation in the Age of Information. New Orleans: Pelican Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Habermas, J. (1981) Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns, Band 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2019) Assembly. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Heidegger, M. (2004) Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Heidegger, M. (1979) Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Heidegger, M. (2021) Zijn en Tijd. Amsterdam: Boom.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Heidegger, M. (1970) Wat is metafysica?Tielt: Uitgeverij Lannoo.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Husserl, E. (1954) Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die Transzendentale Phänomenologie. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhof.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Kuhn, T.S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Luijpen, W. (1964) Existentiële fenomenologie. Utrecht: Aula-boeken.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Lynas, M. (2020) Zes graden. Utrecht: Uitgeverij Jan van Arkel.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. McGuire, B. (2022) Hothouse Earth: An Inhabitant’s Guide. London: Icon Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Philipse, H. (1998) Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being: A Critical Interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Prins, A. (2007) Uit verveling. Kampen: Uitgeverij Klement.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Safranski, R. (2002) Heidegger en zijn tijd. Amsterdam: Olympus.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Sloterdijk, P. (2007) Sferen I: Bellen & II: Globes. Amsterdam: Boom.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Sloterdijk, P. (2009) Sferen III: Schuim. Amsterdam: Boom.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Sloterdijk, P. (2006) Het kristalpaleis: Een filosofie van de globalisering. Amsterdam: Boom/SUN.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Theunissen, M. (1977) Der Andere: Studien zur Sozialontologie der Gegenwart. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Thunberg, G. (2022) Het klimaatboek. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Loon, M. (2022) De airco-paradox: we kunnen mensen niet koel houden zonder de planeet op te warmen, Change Inc., 23mei.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2024.3.008.SAS
Loading
Keyword(s): capitalism; climate anxiety; climate change; conflictuality; ecology; existential anxiety; Martin Heidegger; Peter Sloterdijk; phenomenology; socialisation; Vincent Blok

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error