2004
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2665-9085
  • E-ISSN: 2665-9085

Abstract

Abstract

Computational Communication Research (CCR) is a new open access journal dedicated to publishing high quality computational research in communication science. This editorial introduction describes the role that we envision for the journal. First, we explain what computational communication science is and why a new journal is needed for this subfield. Then, we elaborate on the type of research this journal seeks to publish, and stress the need for transparent and reproducible science. The relation between theoretical development and computational analysis is discussed, and we argue for the value of null-findings and risky research in additive science. Subsequently, the (experimental) two-phase review process is described. In this process, after the first double-blind review phase, an editor can signal that they intend to publish the article conditional on satisfactory revisions. This starts the second review phase, in which authors and reviewers are no longer required to be anonymous and the authors are encouraged to publish a preprint to their article which will be linked as working paper from the journal. Finally, we introduce the four articles that, together with this Introduction, form the inaugural issue.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/CCR2019.1.001.VANA
2019-10-01
2021-09-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/26659085/1/1/01_CCR2019.1_VANA.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/CCR2019.1.001.VANA&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alvarez, R. M.(2016). Computational social science. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Anderson, C.(2008). The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired Magazine. Retrieved from www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Greenwald, A. G.(2012). There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 99–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611434210
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hilbert, M., Barnett, G., Blumenstock, J., Contractor, N., Diesner, J., Frey, S., ... Zhu, J. J. H.(2019). Computational communication science: A methodological catalyzer for a maturing discipline. Accepted for publication in International Journal of Communication.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kitchin, R.(2014). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Hofelich Mohr, A., ... Frank, M. C.(2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lazer, D., Pentland, A. S., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A. L., Brewer, D., ... Alstyne, M. V.(2009). Computational social science. Science (New York, NY), 323(5915), 721–723. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167742
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lazer, D., & Radford, J.(2017). Data ex machina: introduction to big data. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 19–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Margolin, D.(2018). The computational contribution: A symbiotic approach to integrating computational research into the communication field. Presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association (ICA). Prague, Czech Republic.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L.(2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using r (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Du Sert, N. P., ... Ioannidis, J. P.(2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 0021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., ... Yarkoni, T.(2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Peng, T.-Q., Liang, H., & Zhu, J. J.(2019). Introducing computational social science for asia-pacific communication research. Asian Journal of Communication, 29, 205–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2019.1602911
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Pfeffer, J.(1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of management review, 18(4), 599–620.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K., ... Rand, D. G.(2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064–1082.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Shah, D. V., Cappella, J. N., & Neuman, W. R.(2015). Big data, digital media, and computational social science: Possibilities and perils. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 6–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215572084
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tufekci, Z.(2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13(2), 203 – 218.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Van Atteveldt, W., & Peng, T.-Q.(2018). When communication meets computation: Opportunities, challenges, and pitfalls in computational communication science. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(2-3), 81–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1458084
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Van Atteveldt, W., Strycharz, J., Trilling, D., & Welbers, K.(2019). Towards open computational communication science: A practical roadmap for reusable data and code. Accepted for publication in International Journal of Communication.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Weber, R., Fisher, J. T., Hopp, F. R., & Lonergan, C.(2017). Taking messages into the magnet: Method-theory synergy in communication neuroscience. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 81–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1395059
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/CCR2019.1.001.VANA
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error