2004
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 2665-9085

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, wearing a face mask became politicized in the United States, with politicians and reporters employing competing public safety and civil liberties frames in discussions of masking. In this research, we argue that political candidates’ decisions to speak about and depict mask-wearing in their political advertising were strategic, depending on both the candidate’s party and gender. We examine political ads run on Facebook and on television by federal candidates during the 2020 U.S. campaigns. We use Amazon’s deep learning algorithms for PPE (personal protective equipment) detection. We extract the text and audio of each ad to identify mentions of masks and use an à la Carte embedding regression model to understand how the usage of the term mask differs across covariates. We find that images of masks are much more common than mentions of masks, that there are significant partisan, but not gender, differences in the use of masks, and that there are both partisan and gender differences in the way that candidates speak about masking. This research demonstrates the utility of a novel approach to collecting data. It also suggests that public health measures can become partisan in a campaign environment, with the potential to polarize both the views and behaviors of Democrats and Republicans.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/CCR2025.1.2.YAO
2025-01-01
2025-02-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/CCR2025.1.2.YAO
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): COVID-19; digital ads; embedding regression; mask detection
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error