Theodicy as Trajectory: Towards Co-Conquest for Righteousness | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 32, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0960-2720
  • E-ISSN: 2666-9730

Abstract

Summary

This article develops some insights of the apostle Paul and Peter T. Forsyth on a teleological approach to a theodicy. Paul claims that God causes some human suffering in order that people overcome it by enduring and conquering it. This conquering relies on humans choosing lives that hope for and collaborate with divine compassionate righteousness. The article shows what a theodicy looks like given this Pauline position. As an effort to justify God’s treatment of suffering, evil and delayed rescue of humans in the world, a theodicy raises a twofold issue: Does God have good reasons to allow the suffering and the evil that exist; and if so, do humans have access to those reasons? The article considers a God worthy of worship who aims to cultivate compassionate righteousness in humans, using suffering and evil but not coercion of human wills towards him. Theodicy can succeed in this context as God can give meaning to, and a final righteous co-conquest of, suffering and evil.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/EJT2023.1.005.MOSE
2023-04-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boguslawski, Steven R., ‘Implicit Faith in Karl Rahner: A Pauline View’, Irish Theological Quarterly51.4 (1985) 300–308.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brightman, Edgar Sheffield, A Philosophy of Religion (New York: Prentice Hall, 1940).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cranfield, C.E.B., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. 2 Volumes (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1975).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies, W.D., and Dale C.Allison, Jr., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. 3 Volumes (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1997).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Farley, Edward, Divine Empathy (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1996).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Forsyth, P.T., The Justification of God (London: Duckworth, 1916).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fretheim, Terence, Exodus (Interpretation; Louisville: Westminster, 1991).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Leow, Theng Huat, The Theodicy of Peter Taylor Forsyth (Eugene: Pickwick, 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Moser, Paul K., The Divine Goodness of Jesus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021a).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Moser, Paul K., ‘God De Re et De Dicto: Kierkegaard, Faith, and Religious Diversity’, Scottish Journal of Theology74.2 (2021b) 135-46.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Moser, Paul K., Divine Guidance (Elements; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022a).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Moser, Paul K., Paul’s Gospel of Divine Self-Sacrifice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022b).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Moser, Paul K., ‘Divine Self-Disclosure in Filial Values: The Problem of Guided Goodness’, in Modern Theology39.2 (2023), forthcoming.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Robinson, H. Wheeler, Suffering, Human and Divine (London: Macmillan, 1939).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Thielicke, Helmut, Out of the Depths (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1962).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/EJT2023.1.005.MOSE
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error