Learning communities: Een begripsbepaling en verkenning van leerprocessen en kennisbenutting | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 35, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0921-5077
  • E-ISSN: 1875-7235

Abstract

Samenvatting

Learning communities worden steeds populairder om de ontwikkeling van kennis en vaardigheden op het werk te bevorderen. Learning communities zijn leer-werkgemeenschappen waarin werknemers en experts van verschillende organisaties samenkomen om van én met elkaar te leren en te innoveren. Ondanks positieve geluiden vanuit de praktijk is het wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar learning communities schaars en ontbreken studies die de onderliggende mechanismen met betrekking tot leren en kennisbenutting in learning communities verkennen. Dat is een gemis, omdat kennis over de fundamentele werking van learning communities nuttige inzichten kan opleveren over hoe leren in learning communities geoptimaliseerd kan worden. In dit artikel stellen wij dat onderzoek naar de werkende mechanismen van zowel het leren in learning communities als de benutting van kennis in organisaties, rekening moet houden met de unieke kenmerken van learning communities, zoals het inter-organisationele karakter. Daarnaast bespreken we richtingen voor toekomstig onderzoek om de werking van learning communities te doorgronden en learning communities effectiever vorm te geven om bij te dragen aan een leven lang ontwikkelen. Dit artikel vormt daarmee een goede basis om wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar learning communities verder te brengen.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/GO2022.3.003.EMAN
2022-09-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aljuwaiber, A. (2016). Communities of practice as an initiative for knowledge sharing in business organisations: A literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(4), 731-748. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2015-0494
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, S., Ure, D., & Evans, S. (2003). Virtual communities of practice as learning networks. Brigham Young University Instructional Psychology and Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Argote, L., Ingram, P., Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2000). Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1006/OBHD.2000.2883
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1744-6570.1988.TB00632.X
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. WH Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900105
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bates, R., & Holton, E. F. (2004). Linking workplace literacy skills and transfer system perceptions. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(2), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1002/HRDQ.1096
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2010). Toward a theory of learner-centered training design: An integrative framework of active learning. In S. W. J.Kozlowski & E.Salas (Eds.), Learning, training and development in organizations (pp. 263-300). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bell, B. S., Tannenbaum, B. S., Ford, S. I., Noe, J. K., & Kraiger, R. A. (2017). 100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 305-323. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000142
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2010). Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(4), 1065-1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352880
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bobbink, M., Hartmann, A., & Dewulf, G. (2016). Sustaining extended enterprise performance: A value co-creation perspective. Journal of Organization Design, 5(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-016-0005-7
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Braun, M. T., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Brown, T. A., & DeShon, R. P. (2020). Exploring the dynamic team cohesion-performance and coordination-performance relationships of newly formed teams. Small Group Research, 51(5), 551-580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420907157
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2007). Training transfer: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 6(3), 263-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484307303035
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cabrera, Á., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500404614
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, G., & Bliese, P. D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 549-556. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.549
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Coetzer, A., Kock, H., & Wallo, A. (2017). Distinctive characteristics of small businesses as sites for informal learning. Human Resource Development Review, 16(2), 111-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484317704291
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Commissie Sap. (2017). Doorleren werkt. Rapport in opdracht van het Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Crook, T. R., Todd, S. Y., Combs, J. G., Woehr, D. J., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2011). Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022147
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202135
    [Google Scholar]
  20. De Lange, A., Taris, T., Jansen, P., Kompier, M., Houtman, I., & Bongers, P. (2005). Werk en motivatie om te leren: Zijn er verschillen tussen jongere en oudere werknemers?Gedrag & Organisatie, 18(6), 309-325.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. DeChurch, L., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32-53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017328
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dragoni, L. (2005). Understanding the emergence of state goal orientation in organizational work groups: The role of leadership and multilevel climate perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1084-1095. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1084
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Dufour, R. (2004). What is a “Professional Learning Community”?Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Edmondson, A. C. (2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13(2), 128-146. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.2.128.530
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Prasad, J. (2018). Transfer of training: The known and the unknown. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 201-225. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 14-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVB.2003.10.005
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fullan, M. (2005). Professional learning communities writ large. In R.DuFour, R.Eaker, & R.DuFour (Eds.), On common ground: The power of professional learning communities (pp. 209-223). Solution Tree.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fullwood, R., Rowley, J., & Delbridge, R. (2013). Knowledge sharing amongst academics in UK universities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(1), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271311300831
    [Google Scholar]
  30. García-Morales, V. J., Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M. M., & Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, L. (2012). Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 1040-1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.005
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Goldstein, I., & Ford, J. K. (2002). Training in organizations (4th ed.). Wadsworth.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. González-Romá, V., Fortes-Ferreira, L., & Peiró, J. M. (2009). Team climate, climate strength and team performance. A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 511-536. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X370025
    [Google Scholar]
  33. González-Romá, V., Peiró, J. M., & Tordera, N. (2002). An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 465-473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.465
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Grijpstra, D., Bolle, H., & Driessen, T. (2019). Belemmeringen Leven Lang Ontwikkelen. Panteia.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484-500. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0200
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hartgers, M., & Pleyers, A. (2016). Een leven lang leren in Nederland: Een overzicht. CBS.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hauer, E., Nordlund, A. M., & Westerberg, K. (2012). Developmental intervention, learning climate and use of knowledge in elderly care. Journal of Workplace Learning, 24(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665621211191087
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hofstra, N., Vodegel, M., Moeke, D., Van den Tooren, M., Preenen, P. T. Y., Mennens, K., & Schipper, T. (2021). Learning communities in de logistiek: De TIP-ontwikkelmethode. Logistiek+, Special Edition, 128-142.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Jansen in de Wal, J., Den Brok, P. J., Hooijer, J. G., Martens, R. L., & Van den Beemt, A. (2014). Teachers’ engagement in professional learning: Exploring motivational profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 27-36. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.08.001
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Kirkman, B. L., Mathieu, J. E., Cordery, J. L., Rosen, B., & Kukenberger, M. (2011). Managing a new collaborative entity in business organizations: Understanding organizational communities of practice effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1234-1245. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0024198
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Knol, E., & Velzing, E.-J. (2019). Learning communities voor MMIP’s: Een schakel voor versnelling en opschaling. Hogeschool Utrecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Koen, J., Klehe, U. C., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2013). Employability among the long-term unemployed: A futile quest or worth the effort?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVB.2012.11.001
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kornet, A., Koen, J., Emanuel, E. S., Sijbom, R. B. L., & Wallner, C. (2022). Opbrengsten van Learning Communities. In T.Schipper, M.Vos, & C.Wallner (Eds.), Landelijk position paper Learning Communities (pp. 19-26). Hogeschool Windesheim.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kostopoulos, K. C., Spanos, Y. E., & Prastacos, G. P. (2013). Structure and function of team learning emergence: A multilevel empirical validation. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1430-1461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419366
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T., Grand, J. A., Braun, M. T., & Kuljanin, G. (2013). Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organizational Research Methods, 16(4), 581-615. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113493119
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461-477. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Lau, D. C., Lam, L. W., & Wen, S. S. (2014). Examining the effects of feeling trusted by supervisors in the workplace: A self-evaluative perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.1861
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Lehtinen, J., & Ahola, T. (2010). Is performance measurement suitable for an extended enterprise?International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(2), 181-204. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571011018707
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Lindell, M. K., & Brandt, C. J. (2000). Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.331
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Lopez-Cabrales, A., Pérez-Luño, A., & Cabrera, R. V. (2009). Knowledge as a mediator between HRM practices and innovative activity. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 485-503. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20295
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Maurer, T. J., & Tarulli, B. A. (1994). Investigation of perceived environment, perceived outcome, and person variables in relationship to voluntary development activity by employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.1.3
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Mennens, K., Preenen, P. T. Y., Schipper, T., Vos, M., Hofstra, N., & Van den Tooren, M. (2021, September30). A conceptualization of public-private learning communities for technological transformations and beyond. Paper presentation at the BEYOND4.0 scientific conference: Inclusive futures for Europe beyond industrie 4.0 and digital disruption. Sofia, Bulgaria.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Möller, K., & Halinen, A. (2017). Managing business and innovation networks – From strategic nets to business fields and ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDMARMAN.2017.09.018
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.1893935
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Nazari-Shirkouhi, S., Rezazadeh, A., Noruzy, A., Majazi Dalfard, V., & Azhdari, B. (2013). Relations between transformational leadership, organizational learning, knowledge management, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 64, 1073-1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4038-y
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Nerstad, C. G. L., Searle, R., Černe, M., Dysvik, A., Škerlavaj, M., & Scherer, R. (2018). Perceived mastery climate, felt trust, and knowledge sharing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4), 429-447. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.2241
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Nikolova, I., Van Ruysseveldt, J., De Witte, H., & Van Dam, K. (2014). Learning climate scale: Construction, reliability and initial validity evidence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 258-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVB.2014.07.007
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014). Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology And Organizational Behavior, 1, 245-275. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Park, S. H., & Russo, M. V. (1996). When competition eclipses cooperation: An event history analysis of joint venture failure. Management Science, 42(6), 875-890. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.42.6.875
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Parker, S. K. (2017). Work design growth model: How work characteristics promote learning and development. In J. E.Ellingson & R. A.Noe (Eds.), Autonomous learning in the workplace (pp. 137-161). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315674131-8
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827-856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Payne, S., & Mckinney, A. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 128-150. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Perks, H., Gruber, T., & Edvardsson, B. (2012). Co-creation in radical service innovation: A systematic analysis of microlevel processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(6), 935-951. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-5885.2012.00971.X
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Reinhold, S., Gegenfurtner, A., & Lewalter, D. (2018). Social support and motivation to transfer as predictors of training transfer: Testing full and partial mediation using meta-analytic structural equation modelling. International Journal of Training and Development, 22(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJTD.12115
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Saks, A. M. (2002). So what is a good transfer of training estimate? A reply to Fitzpatrick. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 39(3), 29-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Sattayaraksa, T., & Boon-itt, S. (2016). CEO transformational leadership and the new product development process: The mediating roles of organizational learning and innovation culture. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(6), 730-749. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2014-0197
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Schipper, T., Vos, M., & Wallner, C. (Eds.). (2022). Landelijk position paper Learning Communities (in opdracht van NWO). hogeschool Windesheim.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Stolwijk, C., & Seiffert, L. (2016). Fieldlab als aanjager van het innovatie ecosysteem. TNO.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2014). Do organizations spend wisely on employees? Effects of training and development investments on learning and innovation in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 393-412. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.1897
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Topsectoren, & PBT. (2017). Wat maakt dat het werkt?Onderdeel van het publicatievierluik Learning communities 2018-2024. https://issuu.com/pbt-netwerk/docs/061217_pbt_llo_onderzoeksrapport_bi
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Van Dam, K. (2015). Workplace goal orientation: Development of a measure. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31(1), 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/A000207
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802-821. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527385
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Van der Heijde, C. M., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., Scholarios, D., Bozionelos, N., Mikkelsen, A., Epitropaki, O., Marzec, I., Jędrzejowicz, P., Looise, J. C., & the Indic@tor Study Group. (2018). Learning climate perceptions as a determinant of employability: An empirical study among European ICT professionals. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2018.02471
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Van Vuuren, T. (2012). Vitaliteitsmanagement: je hoeft niet ziek te zijn om beter te worden!Gedrag & Organisatie, 25(4), 400-418. https://doi.org/10.5117/2012.025.004.400
    [Google Scholar]
  78. VandeWalle, D., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. (2001). The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 629-640. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.629
    [Google Scholar]
  79. VandeWalle, D., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 390-400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.390
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Verbiest, E. (2016). Professionele leergemeenschappen: Een inleiding (4th ed.). Maklu.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 1-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Yoon, S. W., Song, J. H., Lim, D. H., & Joo, B. K. (2010). Structural determinants of team performance: The mutual influences of learning culture, creativity, and knowledge. Human Resource Development International, 13(3), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2010.483815
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/GO2022.3.003.EMAN
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/GO2022.3.003.EMAN
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error