‘Rechtvaardige oorlog’ | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 73, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0165-2346
  • E-ISSN: 2773-1847

Abstract

Abstract

The key question regarding the validity of ‘Just War’ is analyzed as a limited one: it is not a theory, rather an approach. The underlying issue is the need for a paragraph regarding ethics in case of escalation of international conflict. Its validity depends on the integration in comprehensive concepts of peace, justice and security – even in case of apreference for ‘Just Peace’. The ethics of peace also requires a contemporary political theology. Military chaplaincy has a legitimate educational role to play regarding ‘Just War’ and its future varieties or alternatives.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/KT2022.4.004.IERS
2022-11-01
2024-06-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amalrik, A., Haalt de SovjetUnie 1984? (1948).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biggar, N., in Defence of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brother John of Taizé, The Wrath of a loving God, Unraveling a Biblical Conundrum. Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonhoeffer, D.Ethik (München: Kaiser Verlag1981.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis. C., et.al., Theology and the Political. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dubik, J.M., Just War reconsidered. Strategy, Ethics and Theory. Lexington University Press of Kentucky2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. G.J.Heering, G.-J., de Zondeval van het Christendom. Een studie over Christendom, staat en oorlog, 5de druk. Utrecht; Bijleveld1981.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jonas, H., Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp1992 (oorspr. 1979).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Moltmann, J.Trinität und Reich Gottes. Zur Gotteslehre. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus1986 (Eerste druk: 1980).Kok boekencentrum.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. O’Donovan, O., The Just War Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Paterson, E., (ed.), Ethics Beyond War’s End, Washington D.C. : Georgetown University Press2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Paus Franciscus, EncycliekLaudato Si’, in: Kerkelijke Documentatie2015 nr 2. Utrecht, Secretariaat van het RK Kerkgenootschap.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. PausPaulus VI: encycliek Populorum Progressio1967, zie: Populorum Progressio (March26, 1967) | Paul VI (vatican.va).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Roberts, A.J. & Garton Ash, T., Civil Resistance & Power Politics. The Experience of Non-Violent Action from Ghandi to the Present. Oxford: University Press2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Röling, B.V.A Vredeswetenschap. Utrecht: Aula1981.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SiderR. J. (ed.), The Early Church on Killing. A Comprehensive Sourcebook on War, Abortion, and capital Punishment. Grand Rapids, michigan: Baker Academic Publishing Group2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Smith, D., & Braene, A.The Atlas of War and Peace. Londen: Earthscan: 2003
    [Google Scholar]
  18. United States Conference of atholic Bishops, Events | Publication of “The Challenge of Peace” | Timeline | The Association of Religion Data Archives (thearda.com).
    [Google Scholar]
  19. UN Charter, article 51: Chapter VII: Article 51 — Charter of the United Nations — Repertory of Practice of United Nations Organs — Codification Division Publications.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/KT2022.4.004.IERS
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error