Wetenschap als waarheidsspel? Dupliek op de Goffman- en Mead-controverse

References

1. Beuving, J. (2004). Cotonou’s Klondike: African traders and second-hand car markets in Benin. Journal of Modern African Studies, 42(4), 511-537.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Beuving, J., & De Vries, G. (2015). Doing qualitative research: The craft of naturalistic inquiry. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Freeman, D. (1983). Margaret Mead and Samoa: The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Gigengack, R. (2021). Waarheid en interpretatie in etnografie (deel 1): Spoorzoeken bij marginale groepen en geüniformeerde beroepen. KWALON 78, 26(3), 161-175.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Gigengack, R. (2022). Waarheid en interpretatie in etnografie (deel 2): Discrepanties bij marginale groepen en geüniformeerde beroepen. KWALON, dit nummer.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Goffman, A. (2014). On the run: Fugutive life in an American city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hannam, J. (2010). God’s philosophers: How the medieval world laid the foundations of modern science. New York: Icon Books.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Larson, A. (2017). PO sociology students criticize controversial hire. The Student Life. https://tsl.news/news6782/
   [Google Scholar]
9. Parry, M. (2019). Alice Goffman’s first book made her a star: It wasn’t enough to get her tenure. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/alice-goffmans-first-book-made-her-a-star-it-wasnt-enough-to-get-her-tenure/
   [Google Scholar]
10. Wesselink, F. (2021). Filemon en de complotten. NPO. https://www.npostart.nl/filemon-en-de-complotten/BV_101404802
    [Google Scholar]
11. Wester, F. (2020). Aantekeningen bij de discussie over bewijs in etnografisch onderzoek. KWALON 74, 25(2), 25-26.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Wester, F. (2021). Al is de leugen nog zo snel, herhaling achterhaalt haar wel. KWALON 78, 26(3), 176-177.
    [Google Scholar]