2004
Volume 26, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1385-1535
  • E-ISSN: 1875-7324

Abstract

Abstract

To challenge rigid ideas about objectivity in social science research, qualitative researchers question their own subjectivity in the research process. In such endeavors, the focus is mainly on the positionality of the researcher vis-à-vis their respondents in the research field. In this contribution, I argue that the positionality of the researcher in academia, what I refer to as the researchers’ field, is equally important as it influences the way research findings are received and evaluated. Through reflections on positionality in my insider research concerning labour relations and exploitation in Chinese migrant businesses in the Netherlands and Romania, I explore how my positionality as an insider negatively influenced my credibility and approachability in the researchers’ field. I conclude that it is necessary to pay more attention to researchers’ positionality in academia as it may shed light on and make it possible to discuss the written and unwritten standards of researchers’ credibility and approachability as an academic in the researchers’ field. Accordingly, this could provide insights into the causes of inequalities in academia and contribute to the current challenge for more diversity in academia.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/KWA2021.1.005.HIAH
2021-01-01
2021-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Becker, H.S.(1967). Whose side are we on?Social Problems, 14(3), 239–247.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Delyser, D.(2001). ‘Do you really live here?’ Thoughts on insider research. Geo-graphical Review, 91(1-2), 441–453, DOI:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2001.tb00500.x
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hiah, J.(2019). Having a Chinese job: A study on interdependencies, vulnerabilities and opportunities within migrant businesses in Romania and the Netherlands. PhD thesis Erasmus University Rotterdam, School of Law.
  4. Katz, C.(1994). Playing the field: Questions of fieldwork in geography. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 67–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mayorga-Gallo, S., & Hordge-Freeman, E.(2017). Between marginality and privilege: Gaining access and navigating the field in multi-ethnic settings. Qualitative Research, 17(4), 377–394.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Merton, R.K.(1972). Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 78(1), 9–47.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/KWA2021.1.005.HIAH
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error