Onderzoekende participatie

References

1. Bartels, Koen (2017). The double bind of social innovation: Relational dynamics of change and resistance in neighbourhood governance. In: Urban Studies, 2017, 54(16), 3789–3805.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bartels, Koen; Turnbull, Nick (2019): Relational public administration: a synthesis and heuristic classification of relational approaches. In: Public Management Review, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1632921
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brenninkmeijer, Alex; Bonenkamp, Dick; Oyen, Karen van; Prein, Hugo (2017). Handboek Mediation.Sdu Uitgevers.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brown, J. (2010) The world Café. Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. Berrett Koehler.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. Swallow Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Fischer, R., Ury, W. (2012). Getting to yes. Negotiating an argument without giving in. Random House.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Flyvbjerg, Bent (2001). Making social science matter. Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fossey, Ellie, CarolHarvey, FionaMcDermott, LarryDavidson (2002), Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. In: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717–732.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Glasl, F. (1982). The Process of Conflict Escalation and Roles of Third Parties. In: Bomers, G.B.J., Peterson, R.B. (eds) Conflict Management and Industrial Relations. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1132-6_6
   [Google Scholar]
10. Golafshani, Nahid (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. In: The Qualitative Report. 8(4), 597-607.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Greenwood, Davydd J. (2007). Pragmatic Action Research. In: International Journal of Action Research, 3(1+2), 131-148.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Heikkinen, Hannu L. T.; Huttunen, Rauno & Syrjälä, Leena (2007) Action research as narrative: five principles for validation. In: Educational Action Research, 15(1), 5-19.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hisschemöller, M. & Hoppe, R. (1995). Coping with Intractable Controversies: The Case for Problem Structuring in Policy Design and Analysis. In: Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization, Winter1995-96, 8(4), 40-60.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hope, Kevin W.; Waterman, Heather A. (2003). Praiseworthy pragmatism? Validity and action research. In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44(2), 120–127.
    [Google Scholar]
15. James, William (1980 [1906]). What Pragmatism Means. In: Pragmatism, A new name for some old ways of thinking. Hackett Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Johansson, Anders W. & Lindhult, Erik (2008). Emancipation or workability? Critical versus pragmatic scientific orientation in action research. In: Action Research, 6(1), 95–115.
    [Google Scholar]
17. KuitenbrouwerM (2018) Getting unstuck: the reconstruction clinic as pragmatic intervention in controversial policy disputes. In: Bartels, K and Wittmayer, J.Action Research in Policy Analysis (pp. 177–197). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. A. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Marres, N. (2005). No issue, no public: democratic deficits after the displacement of politics. University of Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Marres, N. (2007). The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy. In: Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 759–780.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mensink, W., KuitenbrouwerM., Schie, N. van (2022). Voorwaarden voor succesvolle conflictbemiddeling. In: Dekker, P. (red) Politieke polarisatie in Nederland. Het Wereldvenster.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Rein, Martin & Schön, Donald (1996). Frame-Critical Policy Analysis and Frame-Reflective Policy Practice. In: Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization, Spring1996, 9(1), 85-104.
    [Google Scholar]
23. FrankE. A. Sander & Stephen B.Goldberg (1994), Fitting the Forum to the Fuss: A User-Friendly Guide to Selecting an ADR Procedure. In: Negotiation Journal, 10(1), 49-68.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Shields (2003). The community of Inquiry. Classical Pragmatism and Public Administration. In: Administration & Society, 35(5), 510-538.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Schon & Rein (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Stappers, P. J., Sanders, E. B. N. (2003). Generative tools for context mapping: tuning the tools. McDonagh et al. (eds.) Design and Emotion. The experience of everyday things. Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Whittemore, R.; Chase, S. K.; Mandle, Carol Lynn (2001). Validity in qualitative research. In: Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522-537.
    [Google Scholar]