Afsluiting: Engagerende methoden als emanciperend instrument | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 28, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1385-1535
  • E-ISSN: 1875-7324
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/KWA2023.3.007.ARDO
2023-10-01
2024-07-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bucholtz, M., Casillas, D. I., Lee, J. S., Lawson, R., & Sayers, D. (2017). Beyond empowerment. Sociolinguistic research: Application and impact, 25-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (30th Anniversary edition). Bloomsbury. (Original work published 1970).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage. http://www.worldcat.org/title/paradigm-dialog/oclc/802559599
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Handreiking: actieonderzoek in het sociaal domein | Movisie
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hammersley, M. (2023). Are There Assessment Criteria for Qualitative Findings? A Challenge Facing Mixed Methods Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-24.1.3935
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tanner, D. (2019). Opening communicative space: What do co-researchers contribute?Qualitative Research, 19(3), 292–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118770076
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De bijdragen in deze KWALON-uitgave.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/KWA2023.3.007.ARDO
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error