Eenduidigheid in omschrijving van kwaliteitscriteria kan inzicht bieden in de betekenis ervan | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
Volume 26, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1385-1535
  • E-ISSN: 1875-7324
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Boeije, H., & Bleijenbergh, I.(2019). Analyseren in kwalitatief onderzoek: Denken en doen. Amsterdam: Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Frambach, J.M., Vleuten, C.P.M. van der, & Durning, S.J.(2013). AM last page: Quality criteria in qualitative and quantitative research. Academic Medicine, 88, 552.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Korstjens, I., & Moser, A., (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120-124.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E.G.(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Maso, I., & Smaling, A.(1998). Kwalitatief onderzoek: praktijk en theorie. Amsterdam: Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Stenfors, T., Kajamaa, A., & Bennett, D.(2020). How to … assess the quality of qualitative research. The Clinical Teacher, 17, 596-599.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tracy, S.J.(2010). Qualitative quality: Eight ‘big-tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 837-851.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error