2004
Volume 26, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1385-1535
  • E-ISSN: 1875-7324

Abstract

Abstract

Research on perpetrators of mass violence in authoritarian contexts is beset by a number of challenges, most importantly the difficulty of managing subject positionality and transparency. For my research on Syrian perpetrators I resorted to the method of undercover ethnography in order not to jeopardize myself and my interviewees, and to circumvent the double prohibitive contexts of the secrecy of the topic, and the censorship of the Syrian government.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/KWALON2021.3.005.UNGO
2021-11-01
2021-10-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aljasem, A. (2021). In the shadow of the state: The rise of Kata’ib al-Baath at Aleppo University after 2011. Journal of Perpetrator Research,3 (2), 87-113.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Art, D. (2016). Archivists and adventurers: Research strategies for authoritarian regimes of the past and present. SSQU Social Science Quarterly, 97 (4), 974-990.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ash, T.G. (1997). The file: A personal history.London: Flamingo.
  4. Baczko, A., Dorronsoro, G., & Quesnay, A. (2018). Civil war in Syria: Mobilization and competing social orders.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Berreman, G. (2007). Behind many masks: Ethnography and impression management. In A.Robben & D.J.J.Sluka (Eds.), Ethnographic fieldwork: An anthropological reader (pp. 153-174). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Beuving, J. (2021). Problems of evidence in ethnography: A methodological reflection on the Goffman/Mead controversies. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 22 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boix, C., & Svolik, M. (2013). The foundations of limited authoritarian government: Institutions, commitment, and power-sharing in dictatorships. The Journal of Politics, 75 (2), 300-316.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Borneman, J., & Masco, J. (2015). Anthropology and the security state. American Anthropologist,117 (4), 781-785.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fine, G. (1993). Ten lies of ethnography: Moral dilemmas of field research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22 (3), 267-294.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghassem-Fachandi, P. (2009). Violence: Ethnographic encounters.London: Bloomsbury.
  11. Glasius, M., Lange, M. de, Bartman, J., Dalmasso, E., Del Sordi, A., et al. (2018). Research, ethics, and risk in the authoritarian field.Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.
  12. Goldsmith, L. (2015). Cycle of fear: Syria’s Alawites in war and peace. London: Hurst.
  13. Goode, J.P., & Ahram, A.I. (2016). Special issue editor’s introduction: Observing autocracies from the ground floor. Social Science Quarterly,97 (4), 823-833.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Haviv, R., & Morley, A. (2015). Blood and honey: A Balkan war journal. Sarajevo: Kultura Sjećanja.
  15. Maček, I. (2011). Sarajevo under siege: Anthropology in wartime.Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  16. Madison, S. (2005). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance.New York: Sage.
  17. Neitzel, S., & Welzer, H. (2012). Soldaten. On fighting, killing and dying: The secret Second World War transcripts of German POWs. London: Simon & Schuster.
  18. Nordstrom, C., & Robben, A. (1996). Fieldwork under fire: Contemporary studies of violence and survival. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  19. Robben, A. (1996). Ethnographic seduction, transference, and resistance in dialogues about terror and violence in Argentina. Ethos, 24, 71-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ryan, C., & Tynen, S. (2020). Fieldwork under surveillance: Rethinking relations of trust, vulnerability, and state power. Geographical Review, 110(1-2), 38-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Scheper-Hughes, N. (2004). Parts unknown: Undercover ethnography of the organs-trafficking underworld. Ethnography, 5 (1), 29-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Shahhoud, A. (2022). Medical génocidaires in the Syrian civil war (2011-2019). Journal of Genocide Research, 24 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sluka, J. (1996). Reflections on managing dangers in fieldwork: Dangerous anthropology in Belfast. In C.Nordstrom & A.Robben (Eds.), Fieldwork under fire: Contemporary studies of violence and culture (pp. 276-294). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Üngör, U.U. (2018). Studying mass murder. OUPblog. Retrieved from https://blog.oup.com/2018/06/studying-mass-murder
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Üngör, U.U. (2019). Paramilitarism: Mass violence in the shadow of the state.Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
  26. Üngör, U.U. (2020). Shabbiha: Paramilitary groups, mass violence and social polarization in Homs. Violence, 1 (1), 59-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Verdery, K. (2014). Secrets and truths: Ethnography in the archive of Romania’s secret police.Budapest: Central European University Press.
  28. Verdery, K. (2018). My life as a spy: Investigations in a secret police file. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  29. Wedeen, L. (1999). Ambiguities of domination: Politics, rhetoric, and symbols in contemporary Syria.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  30. Wood, E. (2006). The ethical challenges of field research in conflict zones. Qualitative Sociology, 29 (3), 267-294.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/KWALON2021.3.005.UNGO
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error