2004
Volume 57, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0165-8204
  • E-ISSN: 2667-1573

Abstract

Abstract

This article discusses two famous ekphraseis, the Shield of Achilles ( 18.478-608) and the Goatherd’s Cup (Theocritus, 1.27-60). It is shown that both ekphraseis can be interpreted metapoetically. In Homer’s shield ekphrasis the creative powers of the Homeric narrator and the divine smith merge. This merging has been carefully prepared by the narrator. The last scene on the shield makes clear that art plays an important role in the life of humans. The ekphrasis also shows what the narrator regards as the proper response to (his) art. The ekphrasis of the cup in Theocritus’ first is full of metapoetical references. The last scene on the cup can be regarded as the most important, because it demonstrates the central role that poetry and thus art should have in human life. The cup is a marvel and so is Theocritus’ poetry: both are worthy of admiration. The relationship between word and image in both ekphraseis can be seen as complementary or paragonal. The paragonal element is especially strong in the ekphrasis of the goatherd’s cup.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2024.3.002.KOOP
2024-10-01
2024-11-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alvensleben, L. von.2022. Erzähler und Figur in Interaktion. Metalepsen in Homers Ilias, Berlijn.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ambühl, A.2021. ‘Childhood and youth in Theocritus’, in E.Sistakou, P.Kyriakou en A.Rengakos (eds), Brill’s companion to Theocritus, Leiden, 494-516.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Becker, A.S.2003. ‘Contest or concert? A speculative essay on ecphrasis and rivalry between the arts’, Classical and Modern Literature23, 1-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowie, A.M.2019. Homer, Iliad book III, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cairns, F.1984. ‘Theocritus’ first Idyll. The literary programme’, Wiener Studien97, 89-113.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Coray, M.2016. Homers Ilias. Gesamtkommentar. Bd. XI: achtzehnter Gesang (Σ): Fasz. 2: Kommentar, Berlijn.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dubel, S.1995. ‘L’arme et la lyre. Remarques sur le sens du bouclier d’Achille dans l’Iliade’, Ktema: Civilisations de l’Orient, de la Grèce et de Rome Antiques20, 245-257.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Erp Taalman Kip, A.M. van.2003. Theokritos, Idyllen en epigrammen, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Frontisi-Ducroux, F.2002. ‘“Avec son diaphragme visionnaire: ἸΔΥΙΗΣΙ ΠΡΑΠΙΔΕΣΣΙ”, Iliade XVIII, 481. À propos du bouclier d’Achille’, Revue des Études Grecques115, 463-484.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gow, A.S.F.1950. Theocritus. Volume II: Commentary, appendix, indexes, and plates, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Grand-Clément, A.2015. ‘Poikilia’, in P.Destrée en P.Murray (eds), A companion to ancient aesthetics, Chichester, 406-420.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hardie, P.R.1985. ‘Imago mundi. Cosmological and ideological aspects of the shield of Achilles’, The Journal of Hellenic Studies105, 11-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heerink, M.2015. Echoing Hylas. A Study in Hellenistic and Roman metapoetics, Madison.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Heerink, M.2016. ‘Valerius Flaccus’ tempel van Sol als inversie van de Aeneis’, Lampas49, 266-279.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Heffernan, J.A.W.1993. Museum of words. The poetics of ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery, Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hollander, J.1995. The gazer’s spirit. Poems speaking to silent works of art, Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hubbard, T.K.1992. ‘Nature and art in the shield of Achilles’, Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics2, 16-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hunter, R.L.1999. Theocritus. A selection: Idylls 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11 and 13, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hunter, R.L.2018. The measure of Homer. The ancient reception of the Iliad and the Odyssey, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jong, I.J.F. de.2011. ‘The shield of Achilles. From metalepsis to mise en abyme’, Ramus40, 1-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jong, I.J.F. de.2015. ‘Pluperfects and the artist in ekphrases. From the shield of Achilles to the shield of Aeneas (and beyond)’, Mnemosyne68, 889-916.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Klooster, J.2021. ‘The programmatic Idylls of Theocritus’, in E.Sistakou, P.Kyriakou en A.Rengakos (eds), Brill’s companion to Theocritus, Leiden, 364-386.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Koopman, N.2016. ‘Over ekphrasis en het schild van Achilles (Ilias 18.478-608)’, Lampas49, 195-208.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Koopman, N.2018. Ancient Greek ekphrasis: Between description and narration. Five linguistic and narratological case studies, Leiden/Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Krul, W.2009. Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, Laocoön: Over de grenzen van schilderkunst en poëzie, Groningen.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Létoublon, F.1999. ‘L’indescriptible bouclier’, in J.N.Kazazes en A.Rengakos (eds), Euphrosyne. Studies in ancient epic and its legacy in honor of Dimitris N. Maronitis, Stuttgart, 211-220.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MacLeod, C.W.1982. Homer, Iliad book XXIV, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Männlein-Robert, I.2007. Stimme, Schrift und Bild. Zum Verhältnis der Künste in der hellenistischen Dichtung, Heidelberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Marg, W.19712. Homer über die Dichtung. Der Schild des Achilleus, Münster.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Martin, R.2000. ‘Wrapping Homer up. Cohesion, discourse, and deviation in the Iliad’, in A.Sharrock en H.Morales (eds), Intratextuality. Greek and Roman textual relations, Oxford, 43-65.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mitchell, W.J.T.1986. Iconology. Image, text, ideology, Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Nünlist, R.1998. Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung, Stuttgart.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Panagiotidou, M.-E.2022. The poetics of ekphrasis. A stylistic approach, Cham.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Porter, J.I.2010. ‘Why art has never been autonomous’, Arethusa43 (The art of art history in Greco-Roman Antiquity), 165-180.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Owen, E.T.1946. The story of the Iliad, Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Payne, M.2007. Theocritus and the invention of fiction, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Rutherford, R.B.2019. Homer, Iliad book XVIII, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Scheid, J. en J.Svenbro. 1996. The craft of Zeus. Myths of weaving and fabric, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Stephens, S.A.2002-2003. ‘Linus song’, Hermathena173-174, 13-28.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Taplin, O.1980. ‘The shield of Achilles within the Iliad’, Greece and Rome27, 1-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Thiel, H. van.20102. Homeri Ilias, Hildesheim.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2024.3.002.KOOP
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error