2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Wijsgerig Perspectief
  4. Volume 65, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 65, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0043-5414
  • E-ISSN: 1875-709X

Abstract

Abstract

This essay examines the complex concerns surrounding AI integration in professional workplaces through the lens of Frankfurt School critical theory, particularly Axel Honneth's work on recognition. Moving beyond reductive narratives of technological progress or worker exploitation, I analyze how AI-mediated labour transforms professional identity and workplace relations. The analysis distinguishes between individual dimensions of alienation (loss of self-determination, domination, meaningless work, and destabilized achievement) and the essential social dimension that Honneth's recognition theory highlights. I argue that AI technologies risk introducing ‘second-order alienation’ by disrupting the interpersonal contexts that make work meaningful and recognition possible and impoverishing opportunities for genuine intersubjective recognition. However, following Honneth's rejection of technological determinism, I suggest that recognition-sensitive integration of AI could preserve and potentially enhance workplace sociality. The central challenge is maintaining workplaces as social spaces where mutual recognition remains possible despite technological mediation – a key consideration for sustaining social freedom in AI-transformed professional environments.

© Joel Anderson
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/WP2025.2.003.ANDE
2025-06-01
2025-07-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Celentano, D. (2024). Labor automation for fair cooperation. Why and how machines should provide meaningful work for all. Journal of Social Philosophy, 55(1), 25–43
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Danaher, J., & S.Nyholm (2021). Automation, work and the achievement gap. AI and Ethics, 1(3), 227–237.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Dejours, C., Deranty, J.-P., Renault, E., & N.H.Smith (2018). The Return of Work in Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Gädeke, D. (2020). From neo-republicanism to critical republicanism. In: B.Leipold, K.Nabulsi en S.White (red.), Radical Republicanism. Recovering the Tradition’s Popular Heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Graeber, D. (2018). Bullshit Jobs. A Theory. New York: Simon & Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition. The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts (J.Anderson, vert.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Honneth, A. (2008). Arbeit und Anerkennung. Versuch einer Neubestimmung. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 56(3), 327–342.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Honneth, A. (2008) (met commentaar van Butler, J., Geuss, R., & J.Lear). Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Honneth, A. (2023). Der arbeitende Souverän. Eine normative Theorie der Arbeit. Berlijn: Suhrkamp Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Jaeggi, R. (2016). Entfremdung. Zur Aktualität eines sozialphilosophischen Problems (2 ed.). Berlijn: Suhrkamp Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Marx, K. (2023). Parijse manuscripten, vert. P.Huijzer. Amsterdam: Boom.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/WP2025.2.003.ANDE
Loading
Keyword(s): alienation; Axel Honneth; recognition theory; social freedom; workplace relations

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error