- Home
- A-Z Publications
- Tijdschrift voor Agrarisch Recht
- Previous Issues
- Volume 86, Issue 2, 2026
Tijdschrift voor Agrarisch Recht - Volume 86, Issue 2, 2026
Volume 86, Issue 2, 2026
- Kort & Bondig
-
- Artikel
-
-
-
Gemeenschap en pacht: een civielrechtelijk samenspel tussen boek 3 en 7 BW
More LessAuthors: mr. R. Jansen & prof. mr. J.W.A. RheinfeldAbstractThis article focuses on the interaction under civil law between the community of property of Title 7, Book 3 of the Dutch Civil Code and the agricultural tenancy law of Title 5, Book 7 of the Dutch Civil Code. It describes, inter alia, how plurality on the side of the agricultural lessor and/or lessee leads to a “agricultural lease community”, what powers the participants have in this community, and the resulting procedural law implications. In addition, this article clarifies how community of property and agricultural tenancy law relate to each other in the context of division, arrangements concerning use, the agricultural lessee’s statutory right of first refusal, which does not apply in the case of division of a community.
-
-
-
-
Wanneer heeft een landbouwer de beschikking en het beheer over zijn landbouwgrond?
More LessAuthors: mr. H.A. van Bommel & mr. H.C.E.P.J. JanssenAbstractWhen is a parcel of agricultural land considered to be “at the disposal” of a farmer, does he exercise “management” over the land he has declared, and does he use that land for an “agricultural activity”? This issue plays a major role in the context of the rules on direct payments to farmers under the Common Agricultural Policy, also referred to as direct income support. In Dutch case law concerning the interpretation of the relevant terms, frequent reference is made tot de judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Landkreis Bad Dürkheim. However, there are also other important judgments of the Court which concern the question of when a farmer is entitled to direct income support in respect of a specific agricultural parcel. The Agrarmarkt Austria judgment, delivered in 2024, shows that a parcel of agricultural land may be at the disposal of a farmer and under his management even where he has transferred that parcel, against payment of a fixed fee for maintenance and harvesting, to a user of his choice. In this article, we set out the legal framework applicable to the aforementioned terms, analyse a number of relevant judgments of the Court, in which particular attention is paid to Agrarmarkt Austrie, and examine their implications for implementation practice in the Netherlands.
-
- Aankondigingen
-
- Artikel
-
- Rechtspraak
-
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 86 (2026)
-
Volume 85 (2025)
-
Volume 84 (2024)
-
Volume 83 (2023)
-
Volume 82 (2022)
-
Volume 81 (2021)
-
Volume 80 (2020)
-
Volume 79 (2019)
-
Volume 78 (2018)
-
Volume 77 (2017)
-
Volume 76 (2016)
-
Volume 75 (2015)
-
Volume 74 (2014)
-
Volume 73 (2013)
-
Volume 72 (2012)
-
Volume 71 (2011)
-
Volume 70 (2010)
-
Volume 69 (2009)
-
Volume 68 (2008)
-
Volume 67 (2007)
-
Volume 66 (2006)
-
Volume 65 (2005)
-
Volume 64 (2004)
-
Volume 63 (2003)
-
Volume 62 (2002)
-
Volume 61 (2001)
-
Volume 60 (2000)
-
Volume 59 (1999)
-
Volume 58 (1998)
-
Volume 57 (1997)
-
Volume 56 (1996)
-
Volume 55 (1995)
-
Volume 54 (1994)
-
Volume 53 (1993)
-
Volume 52 (1992)
-
Volume 51 (1991)
-
Volume 50 (1990)
-
Volume 49 (1989)
-
Volume 48 (1988)
-
Volume 47 (1987)
-
Volume 46 (1986)
-
Volume 45 (1985)
-
Volume 44 (1984)
-
Volume 43 (1983)
-
Volume 42 (1982)
-
Volume 41 (1981)
-
Volume 40 (1980)
Most Read This Month