2004
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2212-4810
  • E-ISSN: 2212-6465

Samenvatting

The aim of the discussion in this article is to explore two different Rabbinic explanations for the status of repentance in human and divine punishment, and to emphasize the essential distinction between them. According to the first explanation the source of accepting repentance is divine mercy upon human beings. Since mercy is not a legitimate consideration in conviction or even in determination of punishment in Jewish criminal law there is no wonder why repentance does not have any role during the criminal procedures in rabbinic court. According to the second explanation the acceptance of repentance by God is similar to the acceptance of flattery and bribe by a Roman corrupted judge. God decides to accept repentance and to forgive the transgressors since it better serves God’s interests. This analogy between repentance and flattery and bribery then explains why rabbinic courts do not take repentance into account.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00401003
2015-12-12
2025-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/22126465/4/1/22124810_004_01_S003_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00401003&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1.  Sokoloff, Dictionary, 135.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00401003
Loading
  • Soort artikel: Research Article
Keyword(s): Jewish penal law; midrash; punishment; rabbinic literature; repentance; Roman courts; Talmud
Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error