OA

Victimhood and Perpetration in Times of Conflict

References

1. Anderson, K.2020. “The Perpetrator Imaginary: Representing Perpetrators of Genocide.” In Researching Perpetrators of Genocide, edited by KjellAnderson and ErinJessee, pp. 23-48. University of Wisconsin Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bull, A. C., & Hansen, H. L.2016. “On Agonistic Memory.”Memory Studies9(4): 390-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698015615935
   [Google Scholar]
3. Hall, S.1985. “Signification, Representation, Ideology: Althusser and the Post-Structuralist Debates.”Critical Studies in Mass Communication2(2): 91-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038509360070
   [Google Scholar]
4. Hirsch, M.2008. “The Generation of Postmemory.”Poetics Today29(1): 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2007-019
   [Google Scholar]
5. Knittel, S. C; Goldberg, Z.2019. Eds. The Routledge International Handbook of Perpetrator Studies. New York and London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Macdonald, S.2008. Difficult heritage: Negotiating the Nazi Past in Nuremberg and Beyond. New York and London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Meskell, L. (2002). Negative heritage and past mastering in archaeology. Anthropological Quarterly75(3): 557–574.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Rigney, A.2025. Remembering Hope. The Cultural Afterlife of Protest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Rothberg, M.2019. The Implicated Subject: Beyond Victims and Perpetrators. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Sodaro, Amy. 2019. “Selective Memory: Memorial Museums, Human Rights, and the Politics of Victimhood.” In Museums and Sites of Persuasion, edited by JoyceApsel and AmySodaro, pp. 19-35. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Tunbridge, J. E.; Ashworth, G. J.1995. Dissonant heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]