-
OAMartyr Materiality in Exhumations under the Spanish Dictatorship: Deconstructing the Francoist Narrative in the 1939 Soto de Aldovea Case
- Amsterdam University Press
- Source: Heritage, Memory and Conflict Journal, Volume 1, Issue 1, Mar 2026, p. 11 - 33
-
- 01 Mar 2026
Abstract
The Spanish Civil War ended in 1939 with Franco’s victory, beginning a dictatorship marked by extreme political repression. The dictatorship initiated an elaborate commemorative regime to honour the Francoist dead and vilify the defeated Republicans. A striking feature of Franco’s memory politics was the Causa General, a bureaucratic accounting of war deaths throughout Spain. The process characterised the regime’s dead as martyrs, whilst demonising Republicans as perpetrators. Forensic science was deployed by the Franco regime in their construction of post war narratives, one of the earliest historical examples of such usage. This article employs the approach of archival forensics to examine the reports of exhumations conducted in 1939, and the contemporaneous media coverage. We examine how facts about the war were constructed by the regime and then disseminated as propaganda. This article will focus on exhumations at Soto de Aldovea (Madrid). In December 1939, the Military Court of the dictatorship in conjunction with a relatives’ association, excavated 414 corpses, which the regime defined as “Martyrs and Fallen”. The examination of human remains was rudimentary, even by the standards of the time. Instead, the regime focused on the associated objects—personal effects, clothing, and documents—which were critical to the identification process. Out of the 414 bodies exhumed, only 69 were identified. Notably, a third were found with valuable personal items, described in detail in the archive, offering material insights into the dead. This exhumation highlights how Franco’s dictatorship used post-war exhumation processes to reinforce its historical narrative. The analysis of the evidence and its role in the identifications, allows us to interrogate the martyrdom narrative of the regime, through his own judicial, forensic, and material construction. This case also enables a critical engagement with the broader issues raised by forensic science as a modality of historical representation.