Betrouwbaarheid en nut in stoïsch denken over vriendschap

References

1. Algra, K.A.2003. ‘The mechanism of social appropriation and its role in Hellenistic ethics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy25, 263-294.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Banateanu, A.2001. La théorie stoïcienne de l’amitié. Essai de reconstruction, Fribourg.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berkel, T.A. van. 2020. The economics of friendship. Conceptions of reciprocity in classical Greece, Leiden/Boston.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boter, G. en R.Brouwer. 2011. Epictetus. Verzameld werk, Amsterdam.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brouwer, R.2014. The Stoic sage. The early Stoics on wisdom, sagehood, and Socrates, Cambridge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Burnet, J.1903. Platonis opera. Vol III, Oxford.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Edwards, C.2018. ‘Conversing with the absent, corresponding with the dead. Friendship and philosophical community in Seneca’s letters’, in P.Ceccarelli, L.Doering, T.Fögen en I.Gildenhard (eds.), Letters and communities. Studies in the socio-political dimensions of ancient epistolography, Oxford, 325-352.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Edwards, C.2019. Seneca. Selected letters, Cambridge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hunink, V.2022. Seneca. De kunst van het geven, Amsterdam.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Inwood, B.1999. ‘Stoic ethics’, in K.A.Algra, J.Barnes, J.Mansfeld en M.Schofield (eds.), The Cambridge history of Hellenistic philosophy, Cambridge, 675-738.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Joosse, A.2014. ‘Weise Übereinstimmung. Die Stoiker über Freundschaft und Konflikte’, in S.Feickert, A.Haut en K.Sharaf (eds.), Faces of communities. Social ties between trust, loyalty and conflict, Göttingen, 209-225.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kaster, R.A.2022. L. Annaei Senecae De beneficiis, De clementia, Apocolocyntosis, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Lesses, G.1993. ‘Austere friends. The Stoics and friendship’, Apeiron26, 57-75.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Long, A.A.2013. ‘Friendship and friends in the Stoic theory of the good life’, in D.Caluori (ed.), Thinking about friendship. Historical and contemporary philosophical perspectives, Basingstoke, 218-239.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Powell, J.G.F.2006. M. Tulli Ciceronis De re publica, De legibus, Cato Maior de senectute, Laelius de amicitia, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Reydams-Schils, G.2005. The Roman Stoics. Self, responsibility, and affection, Chicago/Londen.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Reynolds, L.1965. L. Annaei Senecae Ad Lucilium epistulae morales, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Schenkl, H.1916. Epicteti Dissertationes ab Ariano digestae, Leipzig.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Verhoeven, C.19902. Lucius Annaeus Seneca. Brieven aan Lucilius, Baarn.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Vogt, K.2008. Law, reason and the cosmic city. Political philosophy in the early Stoa, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Volk, K. en J.Zetzel. 2024. Cicero. Laelius de amicitia, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Wachsmuth, C.1884. Ioannis Stobaei anthologii libri duo priores. Vol II, Berlijn.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Wal, R. van der. 2012. Cicero. Vriendschap, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Wilcox, A.2012. The gift of correspondence in classical Rome. Friendship in Cicero’s Ad familiares and Seneca’s Moral epistles, Madison, WI.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Wildberger, J.2018. ‘Amicitia and eros. Seneca’s adaptation of a Stoic concept of friendship for Roman men in progress’, in G.M.Müller en F.Mariani-Zini (eds.), Philosophie in Rom – Römische Philosophie? Kultur-, literatur- und philosophiegeschichtliche Perspektiven, Berlijn/Boston, 387-425.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Williams, C.2012. Reading Roman friendship, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]