2004
Volume 51 Number 1/2
  • ISSN: 1781-7838
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1792

Abstract

Abstract

This article reexamines rabbinic-lay relations in seventeenth-century Amsterdam through a close analysis of a little-studied constitutional provision of the Kahal Kadosh Talmud Torah: Article 42, which established a standing committee of six representatives empowered to amend the community’s founding agreements. Shifting attention away from questions of personality and temperament that have shaped some earlier portrayals of relations among the community’s rabbis, the study reads bureaucratic records as evidence of structural tensions within communal governance. By tracing invocations of Article 42 in conflicts involving Menasseh ben Israel and other rabbis, the article shows that disputes centered not merely on discipline or decorum, but on competing conceptions of what authority and legitimacy were conferred by communal office. The committee of six functioned as a constitutional ‘escape hatch,’ preserving a form of collective authority that could limit the Ma’amad’s power over officially appointed rabbis. This overlooked mechanism complicates prevailing assumptions about rabbinic subordination and reveals persistent contestation of the rabbinic role for the better part of the seventeenth century.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/SR2025.1-2.005.ORAV
2025-12-01
2026-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/17817838/51/1/2/SR2025.1-2.005.ORAV.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/SR2025.1-2.005.ORAV&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aboab da Fonseca, Isaac. Exortação, paraque os tementes do Senhor na observança dos preceitos de sua Sancta Ley, não cayão em peccado por falta da conviniente inteligencia. Amsterdam, 1680.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Albert, Anne Oravetz. “‘A Civil Death’: Sovereignty and the Jewish Republic in an Early Modern Treatment of Genesis 49: 10.” In Jewish Culture in Early Modern Europe: Essays in Honor of David B. Ruderman, edited by Richard I.Cohen, Natalie B.Dohrmann, AdamShear, and ElchananReiner, 63-74. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Albert, Anne O.Jewish Politics in Spinoza’s Amsterdam. London: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bodian, Miriam. “The Escamot of the Spanish-Portuguese Community of London, 1664.”Michael9 (1985), 9-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bodian, Miriam. Hebrews of the Portuguese Nation: Conversos and Community in Early Modern Amsterdam. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonfil, Robert. Rabbis and Jewish Communities in Renaissance Italy. Translated by JonathanChipman. Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dweck, Yaacob. Dissident Rabbi: The Life of Jacob Sasportas. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaplan, Yosef. “The Social Functions of the Herem.” In An Alternative Path to Modernity. The Sephardi Diaspora in Western Europe, 108-142. Leiden: Brill, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaplan, Yosef. “Bans in the Sephardi Community of Amsterdam in the Late Seventeenth Century” (Heb.). In Exile after Diaspora: Research in the History of the Jewish People Dedicated to Professor Haim Beinart on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, edited by AaronMirsky, AbrahamGrossman, and YosefKaplan, 517-40. Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi Institute, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Katz, Jacob. “The Changing Position and Outlook of Halakhists in Early Modernity.” In Scholars and Scholarship: The Interaction between Judaism and Other Cultures, edited by LeoLandman, 93-106. New York: Yeshiva University Press, 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kayserling, Meyer. The Life and Labours of Manassah ben Israel, trans. F.de Sola Mendes. In Miscellany of Hebrew Literature, edited by A.Löwy, vol. 2. London: Trübner and Co., 1877.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Livro dos acordos da naçam, escamot e eleiçoms do K. K. de T. T. que el Dio augmente [1639-80]. Stadsarchief Amsterdam334, 19.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Malkiel, David. A Separate Republic: The Mechanics and Dynamics of Venetian Jewish Self-Government, 1607-1624. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nadler, Steven. Menasseh ben Israel: Rabbi of Amsterdam. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rosenberg, Shalom. “Emunat Hakhamim.” In Jewish Thought in the Seventeenth Century, edited by IsadoreTwersky and BernardSeptimus, 285-341. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Roth, Cecil. A Life of Menasseh ben Israel: Rabbi, Printer, and Diplomat. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1945.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ruderman, David B.Early Modern Jewry: A New Cultural History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Swetschinski, Daniel. Reluctant Cosmopolitans: The Portuguese Jews of Seventeenth-Century Amsterdam. Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Teller, Adam. “The Laicization of Early Modern Jewish Society: The Development of the Polish Communal Rabbinate in the 16th Century.” In Schoepferische Momente des Europaischen Judentums in der Frühen Neuzeit, edited by MichaelGraetz, 333-349. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wolf, Lucien. Menasseh ben Israel’s Mission to Oliver Cromwell. London: MacMillan, 1901.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/SR2025.1-2.005.ORAV
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error