OA

Open science and the exaggeration of gender differences in scientific literature

References

1. Fine, C.(2010). Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. New York: WW Norton & Company.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Foster, E.D., & Deardorff, A.(2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 105(2), 203.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Kosakowska-Berezecka, N.(2018). Towards gender harmony project. Retrieved from https://towardsgenderharmony.ug.edu.pl/collaborators-faq/
   [Google Scholar]
4. Logtenberg, H., & Van de Wiel, C. (2019, May 14). Bij hoogleraar B. moesten de vrouwen hakken dragen. Retrieved from https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2019/05/14/bij-hoogleraar-b-moesten-de-vrouwen-hakken-dragen-a3960238
   [Google Scholar]
5. McShane, B.B., Tackett, J.L., Böckenholt, U., & Gelman, A.(2019). Large-scale replication projects in contemporary psychological research. The American Statistician, 73(sup1), 99–105.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L.D., & Simmons, J.P.(2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Shrout, P.E., & Rodgers, J.L.(2018). Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual review of psychology, 69, 487–510.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Szucs, D., & Ioannidis, J.(2017). When null hypothesis significance testing is unsuitable for research: A reassessment. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 11, 390.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Van der Lee, R., & Ellemers, N.(2015). Gender contributes to personal research funding success in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40), 12349–12353.
   [Google Scholar]