Gender, class and daily mobility in a global city | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 26, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1388-3186
  • E-ISSN: 2352-2437

Abstract

Abstract

The gendered distribution of trips linked to the domestic sphere and to care work have been highlighted by a range of feminist geographers and sociologists since the 1980s. Yet, little research has shed light on how class relations intersect with this gendered mobility. The study on intersection of class and gender is particularly relevant in Global cities as places that concentrate both highly-skilled and low-skilled female workers, connected to intertwined migration flows. This paper will use the Domestic Mobility Work as a conceptual framework to highlight how in a ‘small global city’ – Brussels – highly qualified female workers and mothers manage their gendered spatial constraints, mostly by calling on the services of lower class women. Through semi-structured interviews with high-profile female workers with children, it shows that delegating mobility workload is crucial for them to fulfill their career and to maintain an ideal of gender equality within the couple. But the interviewees also shed light on the challenge delegating care work poses to their identity as mothers. They also show the gendered relevance of mobility services offered by care and educational institutions, set up exclusively for the benefit of employees in the international sector. The article calls for further research on the intersections of class, gender and migration in global cities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2023.1.005.GILO
2023-04-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13883186/26/1/TVGN2023.1.005.GILO.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2023.1.005.GILO&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. APEEE (Association des Parents d’Élèves de l’École européenne). (2016). Transport FAQ. APEEE Parents’ Association. Retrieved from: http://www.uccleparents.org/transport-home/faq-2/?lang=en. (Last accessed on: 11April2019)
  2. Belton Chevallier, L, Motte-Baumvol, B., & ShearmurR.G. (2011). Différences de genre et formes de dépendances des conjoints biactifs dans l’accompagnement des enfants. Géographie, économie, société13(2), 189–206.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bihr, A., & Pfefferkorn, R. (1996, September). Travail domestique et vie privée. Au coeur de la domination masculine. Le Monde Diplomatique.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bihr, A., & Pfefferkorn, R. (2008). Le système des inégalités (Vol. 511. Thèses & débats). Paris: Découverte.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyer, K., & Spinney, J. (2016). Motherhood, mobility and materiality: Material entanglements, journey-making and the process of ‘becoming mother’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(6), 1113–1131.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruxelles Environnement (2014). Les Plans de déplacements d’entreprise en RBC – Bilan de La Situation 2011. Brussels: Bruxelles Environnement.
  7. Castells, M. (1978a). The urban question. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Castells, M. (1978b). City, class and power. London: Macmillan Education UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Curran, W. (2017). Gender and gentrification (Routledge Critical Studies in Urbanism and the City). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Daniels, A.K. (1987). Invisible work. Social Problems, 34(5), 403–415.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Delphy, C. (1998). L’ennemi principal. Paris: Syllepse.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Delphi, C. (2010). Un universalisme si particulier: Féminisme et exception française (1980-2010) (Collection Nouvelles Questions Féministes). Paris: Syllepse.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. De Laet, S. (2018). Les classes populaires aussi quittent Bruxelles. Une analyse de la périurbanisation des populations à bas revenus. Brussels Studies, http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/1630
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Demoli, Y., & Gilow, M. (2019). Mobilité parentale en Belgique: question de genre, question de classe. Espaces et sociétés176-177(1), 137.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Desiere, S., Struyven, L., Cuyvers, L., & and Gangji, A. (2018). L’emploi international: enfin présent dans les statistiques sur le marché du travail. IBSA Focus, 24.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dupont-Kerlan, E., & Fontaine, H. (2004). Femmes, transports et villes. In S.Denèfle (Ed.), Femmes et villes (Perspectives Villes et Territoires) (pp. 123–133). Tours: Presses universitaires François-Rabelais.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ehrenreich, B., & Hochschild, A. (2003). Introduction. In B.Ehrenreich & A.Hochschild (Eds.), Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy(1st ed.) (pp. 1–14). New York: Metropolitan Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Elvin-Nowak, Y. (1999). The meaning of guilt: A phenomenological description of employed mothers’ experiences of guilt. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 73–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fan, Y. (2017). Household structure and gender differences in travel time: Spouse/partner presence, parenthood, and breadwinner status. Transportation, 44(2), 271–291.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gilow, M. (2018). ‘Maman-Taxi’: Repenser l’espace urbain depuis la mobilité parentale. In D.Paternotte & M.Sacco (Eds.), Partager la ville. Genre et espace public en belgique francophone (pp. 97–110). Louvain-La-Neuve.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gilow, M. (2019). Le travail domestique de mobilité. Un concept pour comprendre la mobilité quotidienne des travailleuses avec enfants à Bruxelles. Brussels: Université Libre de Bruxelles.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gilow, M. (2020). ‘It’s work, physically and logistically’: Analyzing the daily mobility of employed mothers as domestic mobility work. Journal of Transport Geography, 85.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Glorieux, I., & Van Tienoven, T. (2016). Genre et emploi du temps. (Non-)évolution des stéréotypes de genre 1999, 2005 et 2013. Institut pour l’égalité des femmes et des hommes. Retrieved from: http://igvm-iefh.belgium.be
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hochschild, A.R., & Machung, A. (1990). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. London: Piatkus.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jain, S.S.L. (2005). Violent submission: Gendered automobility. Cultural Critique, 61(1), 186–214.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Johansson, M. (2005). Childhood influences on adult travel mode choice. In G.Underwood (Ed.), Traffic and transport psychology. Theory and application. Proceedings of the ICTTP 2004 , (pp. 573–584). Oxford: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaufmann, J.-C. (1992). La trame conjugale: analyse du couple par son linge. Paris: Pocket.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kern, L. (2020). Feminist city. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Krinsky, J., & Simonet, M. (2012). Déni de travail: l’invisibilisation du travail aujourd’hui Introduction. Sociétés contemporaines, 87, 5–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kuzma, E. (2012). Emergence d’une communauté transnationale dans l’espace migratoire européen: analyse de la migration polonaise à Bruxelles, 2002-2009. Brussels: Université Libre de Bruxelles.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kwan, M. (1999). Gender, the home-work link, and space-time patterns of nonemployment activities. Economic Geography, 75(4), 370–394.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lebrun, K., Hubert, M., Dobruszkes, F., & Huynen, P. (2012). L’offre de transport à Bruxelles (Cahiers de l’Observatoire de la mobilité de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale). Brussels: Bruxelles Mobilité.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lieber, M. (2018). “From ‘territories’ to city centers: The ambivalent management of women’s safety and gentrification. French Politics, 16(1), 64–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. McDonald, N.C. (2008). Household interactions and children’s school travel: The effect of parental work patterns on walking and biking to school. Journal of Transport Geography, 16(5), 324–331.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. McDowell, L., Perrons, D., Fagan, C., Ray, K., & Ward, K. (2005). The contradictions and intersections of class and gender in a global city: Placing working women’s lives on the research agenda. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 37(3), 441–461.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. McDowell, L, Ward, K., Fagan, C., Perrons, D., & Ray, K. (2006). Connecting time and space: The significance of transformations in women’s work in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(1), 141–158.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. McGuckin, N., & Murakami, E. (1999). Examining trip-chaining behavior: Comparison of travel by men and women. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1693, 79–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. McGuckin, N., & Nakamoto, Y. (2005). Differences in trip chaining by men and women. Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings, 35, 49–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Montulet, B., & Hubert, M. (2008). Se déplacer avec des enfants à Bruxelles? Une étude sociologique sur les vécus du temps et les usages des modes de transport. Brussels Studies, 15.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Moras, A. (2017). ‘This should be my responsibility’: Gender, guilt, privilege and paid domestic work. Gender Issues, 34(1), 44–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Olabarria, M., Pérez, K., Santamariña-Rubio, E., Aragay, J.M., Capdet, M., Peiró, R., … Borrell, C. (2013). Work, family and daily mobility: A new approach to the problem through a mobility survey. Gaceta Sanitaria, 27(5), 433–439.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Paquin, S. (1997). Jacqueline Coutras: Crise urbaine et espaces sexués. Recherches féministes, 10(2), 219.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Saint Martin, A. de (Ed.). (2016). Les transport scolaire des enfants en enseignement spécialisé. Les études du centre Jean Gol, 13.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sánchez de Madariaga, I. (2013). “From women in transport to gender in transport: Challenging conceptual frameworks for improved policymaking. Journal of International Affairs; New York, 67(1), 43–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sánchez de Madariaga, I. (2016). Mobility of care: Introducing new concepts in urban transport. In M.Roberts & I.Sánchez de Madariaga (Eds.), Fair shared cities. The impact of gender planning in Europe (pp. 33–48). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sandberg, L., & Rönnblom, M. (2016). Imagining the ideal city, planning the gender-equal city in Umeå, Sweden. Gender, Place & Culture23(12), 1750–1762.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sassen, S.2009. Global cities and survival circuits. In J.A.Radway, K.Gaines, B.Shank, & Pennyvon Eschen (Eds.), American Studies, (pp. 185–193). West Sussex: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Scheiner, J., & Holz-Rau, C. (2017). Women’s complex daily lives: A gendered look at trip chaining and activity pattern entropy in Germany. Transportation, 44(1),117–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Schwanen, T. (2007). Gender differences in chauffeuring children among dual-earner families. The Professional Geographer59(4), 447–462.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Schwanen, T., Kwan, M., & Ren, F. (2008). How fixed is fixed? Gendered rigidity of space-time constraints and geographies of everyday activities. Geoforum, Placing Splintering Urbanism, 39(6), 2109–2121.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tienoven, T. van, Minnen, J., Glorieux, A., Laurijssen, I., Te Braak, P., and GlorieuxI. (2021). Locking down gender roles? A time-use perspective on gender division of household labour during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in Belgium. Journal of Family Issues.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Van Criekingen, M. (2009). Moving in/out of Brussels’ historical core in the early 2000s: Migration and the effects of gentrification. Urban Studies, 46(4), 825–848.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Vandermotten, C. (2014). Bruxelles, Une lecture de la ville: De l’Europe des marchands à la capitale de l’Europe. Brussels: Université Libre de Bruxelles.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Zucchini, E. (2015). Género y transporte: análisis de la movilidad del cuidado como punto de partida para construir una base de conocimiento más amplia de los patrones de movilidad. El caso de Madrid (Doctoral dissertation). E.T.S. Arquitectura (UPM), Madrid.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Zwerts, E., Janssens, D., & Wets, G. (2007). How the presence of children affects parents’ travel behavior. Paper presented at Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting. Washington DC: TRB.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVGN2023.1.005.GILO
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error