OA

Aantekeningen maken met pen of laptop

References

1. Altamura, L., Vargas, C., & Salmerón, L. (2023). Do new forms of reading pay off? A meta-analysis on the relationship between leisure digital reading habits and text comprehension. Review of Educational Research.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson, E., Carleton, N., Diefenbach, M., & Han, P. (2019). The relationship between uncertainty and affect. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bell, K., & Limber, J. (2009). Reading skill, textbook marking, and course performance. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49, 56-67.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Broeder, P., & Wijk, C. van (2015). A PIRLS approach to literary understanding in secondary education. SHS Web of Conferences, 16, 01001.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chayka, K. (2024). Filterworld – Howalgorithmsflattenedculture. London: Heligo Books.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Fischer, M., & Zwaan, R. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology, 61, 825-850.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Fugate, J., Macrine, S., & CiprianoC. (2019). The role of embodied cognition for transforming learning. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 7, 274-288.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hillesund, T. (2023). Scholarly reading (and writing) and the power of impact factors: a study of distributed cognition and intellectual habits. Frontiers in Psychology, 14: 1165700.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & NewB. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: a new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavioral Research Methods, 42, 643-650.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Korte, M. (2020). The impact of the digital revolution on human brain and behavior: where do we stand?Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 22, 101-111.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Liu, M., & UesakaY. (2022). Identification of cognitive activities that underlie variations in lecture note-taking: an exploration of Japanese and Chinese high school students’ strategies in mathematics class. Frontiers in Education, 7: 893237.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Mangen, A., & BalsvikL. (2016). Pen or keyboard in beginning writing instruction? Some perspectives from embodied cognition. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 5, 99-106.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Mathura, S., & Arunkumar, T. (2023). The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review. Frontiers in Cognition, 2: 1203077.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Medwell, J., & WrayD. (2007). Handwriting: what do we know and what do we need to know?Literacy, 41, 10-15.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. (2019). How much mightier is the pen than the keyboard for note-taking? A replication and extension of Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014). Educational Psychology Review, 31, 753–780.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Mueller, P., & Oppenheimer, D. (2014). The Pen is Mightier than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand over Laptop Note Taking. Psychological Science, 25, 1159-1168 (zie ook het Corrigendum. Psychological Science, 2018, 29, 1-4).
    [Google Scholar]
17. Mullis, I., & MartinM. (2019, Eds). PIRLS2021 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hull, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
    [Google Scholar]
18. OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and analytical framework. Parijs: OECD Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Reddington, L., Peverly, S., & Block, C. (2015). An examination of some of the cognitive and motivation variables related to gender differences in lecture note taking. Reading and Writing, 28, 1155-1185.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Skowronek, J., Seifert, A., & Lindberg, S. (2023). The mere presence of a smartphone reduces basal attentional performance. Scientific Reports, 13, article number 9363.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, Vol. 333, No. 6043, 776-778.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Urry, H., Crittle, C. et al (2021). Don’t ditch the laptop just yet: A direct replication of Mueller and Oppenheimer’s (2014) Study 1 plus mini meta-analyses across similar studies. Psychological Science, 32, 326–339.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Weel, R. van der, & Meer, A. van der (2023). Handwriting but not typewriting leads to widespread brain connectivity; A high-density EEG study with implications for the classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 14:1219945.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Wiechmann, W., Edwards, R., Low, C., Wray, A., Boysen-Osborn, M., & Toohey, S. (2022). No difference in factual or conceptual recall comprehension for tablet, laptop, and handwritten note-taking by medical students in the United States: a survey-based observational study. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 19:8.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Wijk, C. van (2025). Lexicale en contextuele facilitatie bij literair lezen: effecten op begrip en beleving in relatie met schooltype, gender en migratieachtergrond. Nederlandse letterkunde, 30 (te verschijnen).
    [Google Scholar]
26. Zubair, U., Khan, M., & Lashari, M. (2023). Link between excessive social media use and psychiatric disorders. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 85, 875-878.
    [Google Scholar]