oa Institutionele voorwaarden voor een brede, inclusieve rede

References

1. Allport, G. (1954) The nature of prejudice. Cambridge (Mass.): Addison-Wesley.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Appiah, K. A. (2011) The honor code: How moral revolutions happen. Londen: WW Norton & Company.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Buchanan, A., & Powell, R. (2018). The evolution of moral progress: A biocultural theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dovidio, J. F., Love, A., Schellhaas, F. M. en Hewstone, M. (2017) Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20 (5), pp. 606-620.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Heersmink, R. (2017) Distributed cognition and distributed morality: Agency, artifacts and systems. Science and engineering ethics, 23(2), pp 431-448.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Hurenkamp, M. en E.Tonkens (2021a) En nou ik mag ik even! Burgerschap: wat is het en wat kun je ermee?Boom: Amsterdam.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hurenkamp, M. en E.Tonkens (2021), Laat rijken betalen voor het klimaat, NRC5november2021https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2021/11/05/laat-rijken-betalen-voor-het-klimaat-a4064486
   [Google Scholar]
8. Kende, J., Phalet, K., Van den Noortgate, W., Kara, A. en Fischer, R. (2018) Equality revisited: A cultural meta-analysis of intergroup contact and prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 887-895.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lichterman, P. (2012) Elusive togetherness: Church Groups Trying to Bridge America’s Divisions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Lytle, A. (2018) Intergroup contact theory: Recent developments and future directions. Social Justice Research, 31(4), pp. 374-385.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Mercier, H. en Sperber, D. (2017). The enigma of reason. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Mullainathan, S. en Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. Londen: Allen Lane.
    [Google Scholar]