Institutionele voorwaarden voor een brede, inclusieve rede | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 114 Number 1
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2022.1.011.TONK
2022-04-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allport, G. (1954) The nature of prejudice. Cambridge (Mass.): Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Appiah, K. A. (2011) The honor code: How moral revolutions happen. Londen: WW Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Buchanan, A., & Powell, R. (2018). The evolution of moral progress: A biocultural theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dovidio, J. F., Love, A., Schellhaas, F. M. en Hewstone, M. (2017) Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20 (5), pp. 606-620.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Heersmink, R. (2017) Distributed cognition and distributed morality: Agency, artifacts and systems. Science and engineering ethics, 23(2), pp 431-448.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hurenkamp, M. en E.Tonkens (2021a) En nou ik mag ik even! Burgerschap: wat is het en wat kun je ermee?Boom: Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hurenkamp, M. en E.Tonkens (2021), Laat rijken betalen voor het klimaat, NRC5november2021https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2021/11/05/laat-rijken-betalen-voor-het-klimaat-a4064486
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kende, J., Phalet, K., Van den Noortgate, W., Kara, A. en Fischer, R. (2018) Equality revisited: A cultural meta-analysis of intergroup contact and prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 887-895.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lichterman, P. (2012) Elusive togetherness: Church Groups Trying to Bridge America’s Divisions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lytle, A. (2018) Intergroup contact theory: Recent developments and future directions. Social Justice Research, 31(4), pp. 374-385.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Mercier, H. en Sperber, D. (2017). The enigma of reason. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mullainathan, S. en Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. Londen: Allen Lane.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2022.1.011.TONK
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error