Reinhart, of natuur en verbeelding. Een ecokritische analyse van de verhouding tussen mens en natuurlijke omgeving in Reinhart, of natuur en godsdienst

References

1. Alaimo, Stacy, Bodily Natures. Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 2010.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Braidotti, Rosi & MariaHlavajova, ‘(Material) Ecocriticism’, in: Posthuman Glossary, 2018, 110-153, https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/posthumanglossary/e, laatst geraadpleegd op 11/11/2021.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Branch, M., ‘Indexing American Possibilities. The Natural History of Writing of Bartram, Wilson and Audubon’, in: CheryllGlotfelty & HaroldFromm (red.), The Ecocriticism Reader. Landmarks in Literary Ecology. London, The University of Georgia Press, 1996, 282-302.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Burke, Edmund, A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, with an Introductory Discourse Concerning Taste and Several Other Additions. London, Thomas McLean, 1823.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Clark, Timothy, The Value of Ecocriticism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cronon, William, ‘The Trouble with Wilderness. Or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature’, in: Environmental History1, 1996, 1, 47-55.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Coetzee, John M., White Writing. On the Culture of Letters in South Africa. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1988.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Certeau, Michel de, The Writing of History. New York, Colombia University Press, 1992.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Garrard, Gref, Ecocriticism. The New Critical Idiom. Londen, Routledge, 2004.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gifford, Terry, Pastoral. Londen, Routledge, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Greenblatt, Stephen, Marvelous Possessions. The Wonder of the World. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Heise, Ursula K., ‘The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Ecocriticsm’, in: PMLA121, 2006, 2, 503-516.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hit, Christopher, ‘Toward an Ecocritical Sublime’, in: New Literary History30, 1999, 3, 603-623.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Huggan, Graham & HelenTiffin, Postcolonial Ecocriticism. Literature, Animals, Environment. Londen, Routledge, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Johannes, Gert-Jan & IngerLeemans, Worm en donder. Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse literatuur 1700-1800: de Republiek. Amsterdam, Bert Bakker, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Johannes, Gert-Jan, Geduchte verbeeldingskracht. Een onderzoek naar het literaire denken over de verbeelding – van Van Alphen tot Verwey. Amsterdam, Verloren, 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kerridge, Richard, ‘Ecocritical Approaches to Literary Form and Genre. Urgency, Depth, Provisionality, Temporality’, in: GregGarard (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Ecocriticism. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kloek, Joost J., ‘Rhijnvis Feith, het belang en de gevoelige lezer. Een receptie-esthetische problematiek avant la lettre’, in: Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde97, 1981, 120-145.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Paasman, Albertus N., Reinhart. Nederlandse literatuur en slavernij ten tijde van de verlichting. Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 1984.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Post, Elizabeth M., Reinhart, of natuur en godsdienst. Amsterdam, Johannes Allart, 1791-1792.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ramakers, Bart, ‘Staging Nature. Observation, Imagination and Experience in E.M. Post’s “Het land, in brieven” (1788)’, in: Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek61, 2011, 331-367.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Shaw, Philip, The Sublime. The New Critical Idiom. Londen, Routledge, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Townsend, Dabney, ‘The Picturesque’, in: Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism55, 1997, 4, 365-376.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Veen, Pierre A.F. van, De soeticheydt des buyten levens, vergheselschapt met de boucken. Den Haag, Van Goor Zonen, 1960.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Williams, Raymond, The Country and the City. New York, Oxford University Press, 1975.
    [Google Scholar]