2004
Volume 117, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244

Abstract

Abstract

Being yourself with others – the art of maintaining your individuality while engaging and growing in social interactions – is a challenge for everyone. A philosophical account of authenticity should be able to explain why this is inherently difficult. In this response, I start from De Haan’s exposition on relational authenticity to further explore the tension between experiences that feel as being ‘one’s own’ vs. ‘alien’ to oneself in relation to others. Does an enactivist understanding of authenticity provide any guidance in distinguishing between the two? I introduce the notion of self-affirming participation and explore how it might help clarify this distinction and elucidate the complexity of becoming oneself with others

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW.2025.1.004.STRI
2025-03-01
2025-03-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. De Haan, S. (2025) Jezelf zijn doe je niet alleen: Een enactivistische benadering van relationele authenticiteit, Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte (dit nummer).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007) Participatory Sense-Making: An Enactive Approach to Social Cognition, Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences6, pp. 485-507.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (2000) Playing with Reality III: The Persistence of Dual Psychic Reality in Borderline Patients, International Journal of Psychoanalysis81, pp. 853-874.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jonas, H. (1992) Philosophische Untersuchungen und metaphysische Vermutungen. Frankfurt am Main und Leipzig: Insel.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002) The concept of flow, in: Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Pres, pp. 89-105.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Weber, A., & Varela, F. J. (2002) Life after Kant: Natural Purposes and the Autopoietic Foundations of Biological Individuality, Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences1(2), pp. 97-125.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW.2025.1.004.STRI
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error