2004
Volume 117, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244

Abstract

Abstract

De Haan’s enactivist approach enables a mapping of the scope of relational authenticity and clarifies the ambivalent role of others (and the environment) within this concept. However, since it remains unclear how this approach can establish a boundary to distinguish authenticity from inauthenticity, we find it less suitable for addressing critical questions about authentic action and society’s role in shaping it.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW.2025.1.003.BRUI
2025-03-01
2025-03-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. De Haan, S. (2025) Jezelf zijn doe je niet alleen: Een enactivistische benadering van relationele authenticiteit, Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte (dit nummer).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fleeson, W., & Wilt, J. (2010) The relevance of Big Five trait content in behavior to subjective authenticity: Do high levels of within-person behavioral variability undermine or enable authenticity achievement?Journal of Personality, 78(4), 1353–1382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00653.x
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gallagher, S., Morgan, B., & Rokotnitz, N. (2018) Relational authenticity, in: G.Caruso & O.Flanagan (red.), Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience. Oxford University Press, pp. 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190460723.003.0008
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW.2025.1.003.BRUI
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error