2004
Volume 112, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244

Abstract

Abstract

In Heidegger’s ‘Black Notebooks’, his geophilosophy, the fact that he attributes a crucial importance to different places, becomes more evident than in his other works. The effect of this geophilosophy is that ontological difference – the key point of Heidegger’s thinking – is mixed up with, or replaced by, ontic differences. If in Dasein’s ‘ground’ is an openness to Being, later this word often refers to Germany as a specific country. In 1939, just before the start of World War II, Hölderlin’s view of the relationship between ‘the own’ and ‘the foreign’ inspires Heidegger to see the possibility of a complementary relationship between the German and the Russian people. During and after World War II, Heidegger’s criticism of ‘Western’ metaphysics is strongly colored by his hostility to England, France and the U.S.A. In response to metaphysical universalism he relates different types of it to specific regions on earth. Remarkably, his criticism of metaphysics brings him to both support and criticize the notion of race.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2020.2.006.VANP
2020-07-01
2022-05-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Di Cesare, D. (2016[2014], Heidegger, die Juden, die Shoah. Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Deleuze, G., en F.Guattari(1991)Qu’est-ce que la philosophie?Parijs: Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Denker, A.(2017)Onderweg in Zijn en Tijd. Inleiding in het leven en werk van Martin Heidegger. Budel: Damon.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Heidegger, M. (1986[1927]) Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. (Zijn en Tijd. vertaald door Mark Wildschut, Nijmegen:SUN, 1998).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Heidegger, M. (vanaf 1978) Gesamtausgabe. Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heidegger Studies, Vol. 32-34, jrg. 2016-2018, Duncker&Humblot, Berlin.
  7. Hölderlin, F.(1954)Sämtliche Werke, Band 6, Hälfte 1. Stuttgart: Württembergischen Landesbibliothek.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lefort, C.(1992)Het democratisch tekort. Over de noodzakelijke onbepaaldheid van de democratie, Meppel: Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lyotard, F.-F.(1988)Heidegger et “les juifs”. Parijs: Galilée.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Nancy, J.-L.(2015)Banalité de Heidegger. Parijs: Galilée.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Peperstraten, F. van(2009)Der Nazismus-Vorwurf: Wo wird das Denken zur Ideologie?, in: A.Denker en H.Zaborowski (red.) Heidegger und der Nationalsozialismus II. Interpretationen (Heidegger-Jahrbuch 4). Freiburg/München: Verlag Karl Alberts, pp. 281-297.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Schutter, D. de / Arendt, H.(2015)Martin Heidegger – een apologie. Zoetermeer: Klement.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sieg, U.(1989)Die Verjudung des deutschen Geistes, Die Zeit52, 22-12-1989. Zie:https://www.zeit.de/1989/52/die-verjudung-des-deutschen-geistes
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sommer, C.(2015)Heidegger, politische Theologie, in: P.Trawny en A.J.Mitchell (red.) Heidegger, die Juden, noch einmal. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Trawny, P.(2014)Heidegger und der Mythos der jüdischen Weltverschwörung, Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann (Nederlandse vertaling: Heidegger en de mythe van de Joodse wereldsamenzwering).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Trawny, P. en Mitchell, A.J. (red.) Heidegger, die Juden, noch einmal. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2020.2.006.VANP
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error