Kunnen goed geïnformeerde burgers wel betrokken burgers zijn?

References

1. Aristoteles (2011) Politica, vert. Jan MaartenBremer en TonKessels. Groningen: Historische Uitgeverij.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baehr, J. (2011) The Inquiring Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ballantyne, N. (2023) Recent Work on Intellectual Humility: A Philosopher’s Perspective, The Journal of Positive Psychology18(2), pp. 200–220.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barber, B. (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bohman, J. (1996) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bowes, S.M., M.C.Blanchard, T.H.Costello, A.I.Abramowitz en S.O.Lilienfeld (2020) Intellectual Humility and Between-Party Animus: Implications for Affective Polarization in Two Community Samples, Journal of Research in Personality88, p. 103992.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brennan, J. (2012) The Ethics of Voting. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Church, I.M. en J.Barrett (2016) Intellectual Humility, in: E.L.Worthington Jr, D.E.Davis en J.N.Hook (red.), Routledge Handbook of Humility. Londen: Routledge, pp. 62–75.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Converse, P.E. (1964) The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics, in: D.E.Apter (red.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press), pp. 206–261.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Crowley, Kate en B.W.Head (2017) The Enduring Challenge of ‘Wicked Problems’: Revisiting Rittel and Webber, Policy Sciences50, pp. 539–547.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dang, H. en L.K.Bright (2021) Scientific Conclusions Need Not Be Accurate, Justified, or Believed by Their Authors, Synthese199, pp. 8187–8203.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dewey, J. (1916) Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fishkin, J. S. (2009) When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Franklin, B. (2003). The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, 2e ed., red. L.Labaree, R.Ketcham en H.Boatfield. New Haven, CT: Yale Universtiy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Frederik, J. (2021) Zo hadden we het niet bedoeld. Amsterdam: De Correspondent.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Goodin, R.E. (2008) Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice after the Deliberative Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Guerrero, A. (2021) Doubt and the Revolutionary, Midwest Studies in Philosophy45, pp. 423–456.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gutmann, A. en D.Thompson, D. (1996) Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hannon, M. en I.J.Kidd (2023) Is Intellectual Humility Compatible with Political Conviction? Te verschijnen in Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy. https://philarchive.org/rec/HANIIH.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Head, B. (2019) Forty Years of Wicked Problems Literature: Forging Closer Links to Policy Studies, Policy and Society38(2), pp. 180–197.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Head, B. en J.Alford (2015) Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management, Administration & Society47(6), pp. 711–739.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hodge, A.S., J.N.Hook, D.R.Van Tongeren, D.E.Davis en S.E.McElroy-Heltzel (2021) Political Humility: Engaging Others with Different Political Perspectives, The Journal of Positive Psychology16(4), pp. 526–535.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Johnson, C.R. (2020) Humility and The Toleration of Diverse Ideas, in: M.Alfano, M.Lynch en A.Tanesini (red.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Humility. Londen: Routledge, pp. 148–156.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Joshi, H. (2020) What Are the Chances You’re Right About Everything? An Epistemic Challenge for Modern Partisanship, Politics, Philosophy & Economics19(1), pp. 36–61.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Krumrei-Mancuso, E. (2017) Intellectual Humility and Prosocial Values: Direct and Mediated Effects, The Journal of Positive Psychology12(1), pp. 13–28.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Krumrei-Mancuso, E., M.Haggard, J.P.LaBouff en W.C.Rowatt (2020) Links between Intellectual Humility and Acquiring Knowledge, The Journal of Positive Psychology15(2), pp. 155–170.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kuhn, T.S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (2e editie met naschrift 1970).
    [Google Scholar]
29. Laudan, L. (1981) A Confutation of Convergent Realism, Philosophy of Science48(1), pp. 19–49.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Leary, M., K.J.Diebels, E.K.Davisson, K.P.Jongman-Sereno, J.C.Isherwood, K.T.Raimi, S.A.Deffler en R.H.Hoyle (2017) Cognitive and Interpersonal Features of Intellectual Humility, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin43(6), pp. 793–813.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Manin, B. (1997) The Principles of Represenative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Moran, M., M.Rein en R.E.Goodin (red.) (2008) The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political. Londen: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mouffe, C. (2013) Agonistics: Thinking the Political. Londen: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Mutz, D. (2006) Hearing the Other Side. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pateman, C. (2012) Participatory Democracy Revisited. Perspectives on Politics10, pp. 7–19.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Porter, T. en K.Schumann (2018) Intellectual Humility and Openness to the Opposing View, Self and Identity17(2), pp. 139–162.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Porter, T., C.R.Baldwin, M.T.Warren, E.D.Murray, K.Cotton Bronk, M.J.C.Forgeard, N.E.Snow en E.Jayawickreme (2022) Clarifying the Content of Intellectual humility: A Systematic Review and Integrative Framework, Journal of Personality Assessment104(5), pp. 573–585.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Putnam, H. (1978) Meaning and the Moral Sciences. London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rittel, H. en M.Webber (1973) Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning, Policy Sciences4(2), pp. 155–169.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Roberts, R. en W.J.Wood (2007) Intellectual Virtues. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Sandel, M. (2022) Democracy’s Discontent, 2e ed. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Schön, D. en M.Rein (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Schumpeter, J. (2003 [1942]) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Londen: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Smart, P.R. (2018) Mandevillian Intelligence, Synthese195(9), pp. 4169–4200.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Stanley, M., A.H.Sinclair en P.Seli (2020) Intellectual Humility and Perceptions of Political Ppponents, Journal of Personality88(6), pp. 1196–1216.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Talisse, R. (2019) Overdoing Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Talisse, R. (2021) Sustaining Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Wenman, M. (2013) Agonistic Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Woodard, E. (2023) What’s Wrong with Partisan Deference?, te verschijnen in: A.Worsnip (ed.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Vol. 8 (New York: Oxford University Press), https://philarchive.org/rec/WOOWWW-5.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Zagzebski, L.T. (1996) Virtues of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Zollman, K.J.S. (2010) The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity, Erkenntnis72(1), pp. 17–35.
    [Google Scholar]