Exegesis versus Representation: Assessing Barth’s Exegesis in the Römerbrief After 100 Years

References

1. Aland, Barbara, and others, The Greek New Testament. Fifth Revised Edition (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft and others, 2014); quoted as UBS5.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barth, Karl, Der Römerbrief [1919] (Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, 1985).
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barth, Karl, Der Römerbrief (Zweite Fassung) 1922 (Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, 1940; 22. Auflage 2020).
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barth, Karl, The Epistle to the Romans, trans. by Edwyn C.Hoskyns [1933] (London: Oxford University Press, 1976).
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barth, Karl, Die Auferstehung der Toten: Eine akademische Vorlesung über I. Kor. 15 (München: Kaiser, 1924), at https://archive.org/details/MN41726ucmf_0/mode/2up [accessed 30/05/2023].
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barth, Karl, Die Kirchliche Dogmatik I: Die Lehre vom Wort Gottes 1 (Zürich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1932); English: Church Dogmatics 1.1: The Doctrine of the Word of God I/1, edited by Thomas F.Torrance and Geoffrey W.Bromiley (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1956, repr. 2009) = Barth 2009A.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Barth, Karl, Die Kirchliche Dogmatik I: Die Lehre vom Wort Gottes 2 (Zürich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1938); English: Church Dogmatics 1.2: The Doctrine of the Word of God I/2 (ch. 19-21), edited by Thomas F.Torrance and Geoffrey W.Bromiley (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1956, repr. 2009) = Barth 2009B.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Barth, Karl, Die Kirchliche Dogmatik III: Die Lehre von der Schöpfung 1 (Zürich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1945); English: Church Dogmatics 3.1: The Doctrine of Creation, edited by Thomas F.Torrance and Geoffrey W.Bromiley (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1958).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Barth, Karl, Die Kirchliche Dogmatik IV.1: Die Lehre von der Versöhnung (Zürich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1953); English: Church Dogmatics 4.1: The Doctrine of Reconciliation, edited by Thomas F.Torrance and Geoffrey W.Bromiley (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1956).
   [Google Scholar]
10. Barth, Karl, Die Kirchliche Dogmatik IV.3: Die Lehre von der Versöhnung (Zürich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1959); English: Church Dogmatics 4.3: The Doctrine of Reconciliation, edited by Thomas F.Torrance and Geoffrey W.Bromiley (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1961-1962).
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bosman, Hendrik L., ‘Karl Barth’s interpretation of Scripture from the perspective of a possible “ second naivety”’, Stellenbosch Theological Journal5.3 (2019) 245-263.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Burnett, Richard, Karl Barth‘s Theological Exegesis. The Hermeneutical Principals of the Römerbrief Period (WUNT 2.145; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1976).
    [Google Scholar]
13. Burnett, Richard, The Westminster Handbook to Karl Barth (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2013).
    [Google Scholar]
14. Burnett, Richard, ‘Barth and Theological Exegesis’ in GeorgeHunsinger and Keith L.Johnson (eds), The Wiley Blackwell Companion on Karl Barth volume 2 (New York: Wiley Blackwell, 2020) 727-738.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Busch, Eberhard, Karl Barth and the Pietists: The Young Karl Barth’s Critique of Pietism and Its Response, trans. Daniel W.Bloesch (Downers Grove: IVP, 2004).
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chalamet, Christophe, ‘Bultmann’, in Burnett 2013: 22-25.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Clough, David, ‘Ethics’ in Burnett 2013: 66-69.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cranfield, Charles E.B., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans (ICC; 2 vols.; Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1975, 1979).
    [Google Scholar]
19. Dempsey, Michael T., ‘Biblical Hermeneutics and Spiritual Interpretation: The Revelatory Presence of God in Karl Barth’s Theology of Scripture’, Biblical Theology Bulletin37.3 (2007) 120-131.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Dorrien, Gary, The Barthian Revolt in Modern Theology. Theology without Weapons (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2000).
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Wahrheit und Methode (Tübingen: Mohr, 1960).
    [Google Scholar]
22. Grondin, Jean, ‘Le manifeste herméneutique de Karl Barth’, paper at the Genève University Conference Le Römerbrief de Karl Barth 100 ans plus tard : quelle actualité?, Genève2019-06-05 – 2019-06-07, https://doi.org/1866/27332 [accessed on 20/07/2022].
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jewett, Robert, Romans. A Commentary (Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress, 2006).
    [Google Scholar]
24. Johnson, William S., The Mystery of God. Karl Barth and the Postmodern Foundations of Theology (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1997).
    [Google Scholar]
25. Käsemann, Ernst, Commentary on Romans, trans. and edited by Geoffrey W.Bromiley [1980] (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990).
    [Google Scholar]
26. Keedus, Liisi, ‘“The New World” of Karl Barth: Rethinking the Philosophical and Political Legacies of a Theologian’, The European Legacy25.2 (2020) 167-185, at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10848770.2019.1692598 [accessed 30/05/2023].
    [Google Scholar]
27. Klempa, William, ‘Calvin’, in Burnett 2013: 26-27.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kooi, Cornelis van der, ‚Zweiter Römerbrief‘ in MichaelBeintker (Hrsg.), Barth Handbuch (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016) 195-200.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lietzmann, Hans, Einführung in die Textgeschichte der Paulusbriefe. An die Römer. Handbuch zum Neuen Testament Band 8 (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr [P. Siebeck], 1928), at https://archive.org/details/einfhrungindie00liet/mode/2up [accessed 30/05/2023].
    [Google Scholar]
30. Metzger, Bruce M., A Textual Commentary on The Greek New Testament, Second Edition (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1994).
    [Google Scholar]
31. McCormack, Bruce L., Karl Barth’s Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology. Its Genesis and Development 1909–1936 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).
    [Google Scholar]
32. Mottu, Henry, Karl Barth. Le oui de Dieu à l’humanité (Figures Protestantes; Lyon: Editions Olivétan, 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ward, Graham, Barth, Derrida and the Language of Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
    [Google Scholar]