2004
Volume 23, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1384-5845
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1171

Abstract

Abstract

In this article we investigate what the has to offer concerning Dutch word formation. We note that the is not yet able to provide a large group of users with relevant information in an accessible manner. This is partly due to the fact that the has not yet been made suitable for the Internet, for another part the grammatical information makes ample use of scientific jargon so that it is not readable for the layperson. Finally, on the basis of a few case studies, we check to what extent the can function as a ‘scientific grammar’.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2018.2.007.DON
2018-12-01
2021-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13845845/23/2/07_NEDTAA2018.2.DON.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2018.2.007.DON&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baayen, Harald & RochelleLieber(1993). Verbal prefixes in Dutch: a Study in Lexical Conceptual Structure. In: GeertBooij & Jaapvan Marle (red.), Yearbook of Morphology 1993. Dordrecht: Springer, 51-78.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Mark & NadezhdaVinokurova(2009). On agentive nominalizations and how they differ from event nominalizations. Language85, 517-556.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bobaljik, Jonathan(2012). Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Booij, Geert & Tonvan Haaften(1988). On the external syntax of derived words: evidence from Dutch. In: GeertBooij & Jaapvan Marle (red.), Yearbook of Morphology 1987. Dordrecht: Springer, 29-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Borer, Hagit(2012). In the event of a nominal. In: M.Everaert, M.Marelj & T.Siloni (red.), The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hoekstra, Teun, MonicaLansu & MarionWesterduin(1987). Complexe verba. Glot10, 61-77.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Neeleman, Ad & JoleenSchipper(1993). Verbal prefixation in Dutch: thematic evidence for conversion. In: GeertBooij & Jaapvan Marle (red.), Yearbook of Morphology 1992. Dordrecht: Springer, 57-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Trommelen, Mieke & Wimde Haas(1993). Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands, een overzicht van de woordvorming. Den Haag: SDU.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Van der Putten, Frans(1986). Deverbal adjectives: grammatical or thematic relations?. In: FritsBeukema & AafkeHulk (red.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1986. Dordrecht: Foris, 179-188.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Van der Putten, Frans(1997). Matter and Mind in Morphology, Syntactic and Lexical Deverbal Morphology in Dutch. HAG: Den Haag.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Van derWouden. (2016). Het Taalportaal, een nieuwe wetenschappelijke grammatica voor het Nederlands en het Fries (en het Afrikaans). Nederlandse Taalkunde21(2), 157-168.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2018.2.007.DON
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): comparatives; deverbal nominalisation; suffixation; superlatives; Taalportaal
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error