Suzanne Aalberse, Ad Backus & Pieter Muysken. Heritage languages: a language contact approach

References

1. Aalberse, Suzanne & PieterMuysken(2013). Language contact in heritage languages in the Netherlands. In: J.Duarte & I.Gogolin (red.), Linguistic superdiversity in urban areas. Research approaches. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 253-273.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anttila, Arto(1997). Deriving variation from grammar. In: F.Hinskens, R.van Hout & L.Wetzels (red.), Variation, Change and Phonological Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 35-68.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Boeschoten, Hendrik(2000). Convergence and divergence in migrant Turkish. In: K.Mattheier (red.), Dialect and Migration in a Changing Europe. Frankfurt a. M. etc.: Lang, 145-154.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chappell, Whitney(2019). The Sociophonetic Perception of Heritage Spanish Speakers in the United States: Reactions to Labiodentalized <v> in the Speech of Late Immigrant and U.S.-Born Voices. In: W.Chappell (red.), Recent Advances in the Study of Spanish Sociophonetic Perception. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 240-264.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Fishman, Joshua(2001). 300-plus years of heritage language education in the United States. In: J.Kreeft Peyton, D.Ranard & S.McGinnis (re.), Heritage languages in America: Preserving a national resource. Washington: Center for Applied Linguisticxs / Delta Systems, 81-97.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Hinskens, Frans(1986). The selection of linguistic variables in empirical research on variation and change in dialects. In: B.Weltens, K.de Bot & Th.van Els (red.), Language attrition in progress. Dordrecht / Providence: Foris, 53-74.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Johannessen, Janne Bondi and Joseph C.Salmons (red.) (2015). Germanic Heritage Languages in North America: Acquisition, attrition and change. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
8. Kerswill, Paul(2006). Migration and language. In: K.Matthieier, U.Ammon, & P.Trudgill (red.), Sociolinguistics. An international handbook of the science of language and society. Vol. 3. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2271-2285.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Mattheier, Klaus (red.) (2002). Dialect and Migration in a Changing Europe. Frankfurt a. M. etc.: Lang.
10. Muysken, Pieter(2000). Bilingual speech. A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge: CUP.
11. Muysken, Pieter(2013). Scenarios for language contact. In: R.Hickey (red.), The Handbook of Language Contact. Malden MA/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 265-281.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Nagy, Naomi & WilliamReynolds.1997. Optimality theory and variable word‐final deletion in Faetar.Language Variation and Change9, 37–55.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Polinsky, Maria & GregoryScontras(2020). Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: language and cognition23(1), 1-20. Followed by 14 Peer commentaries and Authors' response. Bilingualism: language and cognition 23 (1), 21-55.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Schirmunsky, Viktor(1930). Sprachgeschichte und Siedelungsmundarten. Germanisch-Romanische MonatsschriftXVIII113-22, 171-188.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Suttcliffe, David(1982), British Black English. Oxford: Blackwell.