2004
Volume 27, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1384-5845
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1171

Abstract

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the generative-linguistic study of Dutch syntax over the last five decades. This is done from three perspectives: a quantitative perspective, a theoretical perspective, and a case study perspective, specifically the case of manner-adverbial patterns of the type ; for example, ‘aloud’.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2022.1.006.CORV
2022-07-01
2022-08-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bach, Emmon & GeorgeHorn (1976). Remarks on Conditions on Transformations. Linguistic Inquiry7, 265-299.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Mark C. (1988). Incorporation. A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barbiers, Sjef, OlafKoeneman & MarikaLekakou (2010). Syntactic doubling and the structure of wh-chains. Journal of Linguistics46, 1-46.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennis, Hans (1995). The meaning of structure: The wat voor construction revisited. Linguistics in the Netherlands 1995. In: M. denDikken & K.Hengeveld (red.), Amsterdam & Philadelpia: John Benjamins, 25-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennis, Hans, NorbertCorver & Marcelden Dikken (1998). Predication in nominal phrases. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics1, 85-117.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Boeckx, Cedric & NorbertHornstein (2010). The varying aims of linguistic theory. In: BricmontJ. & FranckJ. (red.), Chomsky Notebook. New York: Columbia University Press, 115-141.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Borer, Hagit (1984). Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Broekhuis, Hans (1992). Chain-government: Issues in Dutch syntax. Proefschrift, Universiteit van Amsterdam/HIL.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Broekhuis, Hans, NorbertCorver, Marcelden Dikken, EvelienKeizer & RietVos (2012-2019). Syntax of Dutch, 8 boekdelen. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cattell, Ray (1976). Constraints on movement rules. Language52, 18-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chomsky, Noam (1957). Syntactic structures. Den Haag: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chomsky, Noam (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In: JacobsR.A. & RosenbaumP.S. (red.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. 184-221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chomsky, Noam (1977). On wh-movement. In: A.Akmajian, P.Culicover & T.Wasow (red.), Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 71-132.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chomsky, Noam (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chomsky, Noam (1986a). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chomsky, Noam (1986b). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chomsky, Noam (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chomsky, Noam (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua130, 33-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Collins, Chris (2007). Home sweet home. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics1, 1-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Corver, Norbert (1990). The syntax of left branch extractions. Proefschrift, Tilburg University.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Corver, Norbert (2003). A note on micro-dimensions of possession in Dutch and related languages. In: J.Koster & H.van Riemsdijk (red.), Germania et alia. A linguistic Webschrift for Hans den Besten. <http://odur.let.rug.nl/~koster/DenBesten/contents>.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Corver, Norbert & Marjovan Koppen (2011). NP ellipsis with adjectival remnants: A micro- comparative perspective. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory29(2), 371-421.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Corver, Norbert, Marjovan Koppen, HuibKranendonk & MirjamRigterink (2011). Database Diversity in Dutch DP Design (DDiDD). Utrecht, UiL-OTS. <http://www.meertens.knaw.nl/dp_vragenlijst/>.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. De Geest, Wim (1968). Syntaxis voor vandaag en morgen. Wetenschappelijke tijdingenXXVII1, 13-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. De Vooys, C.G.N. (1967). Nederlandse spraakkunst (herzien door M.Schönfeld). Groningen: J.B. Wolters.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Den Besten, Hans (1977). On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. Ms., Universiteit van Amsterdam. [Verschenen in: Besten Den, Hans (1989). Studies in West Germanic Syntax. Proefschrift, KU Brabant]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Den Dikken, Marcel (2013). The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Emonds, Joseph (1976). A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Emonds, Joseph (1987). The Invisible Category Principle. Linguistic Inquiry18, 613-632.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Everaert, Martin, RinyHuijbregts, NoamChomsky, RobertBerwick & JohanBolhuis (2015). Structures, not strings: Linguistics as part of the cognitive sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences19,12: 729-743.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Everaert, Martin & HenkC. Van Riemsdijk (2017). The Wiley-Blackwell companion to syntax. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Feynman, Richard (2007). There is plenty of room at the bottom. In: FeynmanR. (red.), The pleasure of finding things out. London: Penguin Books, 117-140.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hoekstra, Teun (1988). Small clause results. Lingua74, 101-139.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hoekstra, Eric & Jan-WouterZwart (1994). De structuur van CP. Functionele projecties voor topics en vraagwoorden in het Nederlands. Spektator23, 191-212.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Huijbregts, Riny (1991).Clitics. In: ModelJan (red.), Grammatische analyse. Dordrecht: ICG, 279-330.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Katz, Jerrold & PaulM. Postal (1964). An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kayne, Richard S. (2003). Silent years, silent hours. In: DelsingLars-Olaf, CeciliaFalk, GünlogJosefsson & HalldórÁ. Sigurðsson (red.), Grammar in focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack, vol 2. Lund: Wallin and Dalholm, 209-226.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kayne, Richard S. (2005). Movement and silence. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Koopman, Hilda (2000). Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles. In: KoopmanH. (red.), The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads. Routledge: London, 204-260.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Koster, Jan (1975). Dutch as an SOV language. Linguistic Analysis1, 111-136.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kraak, A. & W.G.Klooster (1968). Syntaxis. Culemborg/Keulen: Stan-Kemperman.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Longobardi, Giuseppe (2001). The structure of DPs: Some principles, parameters and problems. In C.Collins & M.Baltin (red.), Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 562-603.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. McCawley, James (1988). Adverbial NPs: Bare or clad in see-through garb?Language64, 583-590.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Paardekooper, P.C. (1966). Inleiding tot de ABN-syntaksis2. Den Bosch.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Paardekooper, P.C. (1986). Beknopte ABN-syntaksis. Eindhoven: P.C. Paardekooper.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Postma, Gertjan (1994). The indefinite reading of WH. In: R.Bok-Bennema & C.Cremers (red.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1994. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 187-198.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Reinhart, Tanya (1976). The syntactic domain of anaphora. Proefschrift, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Ritter, Elizabeth (1988). A head-movement approach to construct state Noun Phrases. Linguistics26, 909-929.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Rizzi, Luigi (1990). Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Schultink, Henk (1971). Moderne Nederlandse grammatica als wetenschap. Studia Neerlandica8, 320-332.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Toorn, M.C. van den (1968). Opvattingen in de moderne grammatica. Levende Talen247, 259-272.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Uhlenbeck, E.M. (1958). Traditionele zinsontleding en syntaxis. Levende Talen193, 18-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen (2004). Ellipsis in Dutch dialects. Proefschrift, Universiteit Leiden. LOT Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Van der Horst, Joop (2008). Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis. Deel 1&2. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Van Riemsdijk, Henk C. (1978). A case study in syntactic markedness. The binding nature of prepositional phrases. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Van Riemsdijk, Henk C. (2018). Constructions. In: N.Hornstein, H.Lasnik, P.Patel-Grosz & C.Yang (red.), Syntactic Structures after 60 years. The impact of the Chomskyan revolution in linguistics. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 317-330.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Weerman, Fred (1989). The V2 conspiracy: A synchronic and a diachronic analysis of verbal positions in the Germanic languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Zwart, Jan-Wouter (1997). Morphosyntax of verb movement: A minimalist approach to the syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Zwart, Jan-Wouter (2011). The syntax of Dutch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2022.1.006.CORV
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error