Blijken: een evidentieel-miratieve outsider

References

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra (2012). The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology16, 435-485.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aijmer, Karen (2009). Seem and evidentiality. Functions of Language16, 63-88.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aksu-Koç, Ayhan & DanSlobin (1986). A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In: W.Chafe & J.Nichols (red.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood: Ablex, 159-167.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Andersson, Lloyd B. (1986). Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps. Typological regular asymmetries. In: W.Chafe & J.Nichols (red.), Evidentiality. The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood: Ablex, 273-312.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bogaert, Julie Van & TimothyColleman (2013). On the grammaticalization of (‘t) schijnt ‘it seems’ as an evidential particle in colloquial Belgian Dutch. Folia Linguistica47, 481-520.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bogaert, Julie Van & TorstenLeuschner (2015). Dutch (‘t) schijnt and German scheint(‘)s: On the grammaticalization of evidential particles. Studia Linguistica69, 86-117.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bomans, Cas (2019). On the development of blijken and turn out: How did these verbs become linguistic markers of surprise? Poster gepresenteerd tijdens A Germanic Sandwich 2019. Amsterdam, 23-24mei2019. [https://www.meertens.knaw.nl/germanicsandwich2019/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Bomans_GS2019.pdf]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Boye, Kasper (2012). Epistemic meaning. A crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Boye, Kasper & PeterHarder (2009). Evidentiality: Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language16, 9-43.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Colleman, Timothy & JulieVan Bogaert (2019). De bronconstructies van Belgisch Nederlands (‘t) schijnt: Een repliek. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde135, 217-225.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Coppen, Peter-Arno (2011). Ik moet niks! Balanceren op het slappe koord van de modaliteit. Onze Taal80, 48-50.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cornillie, Bert (2007). Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Spanish (semi-) auxiliaries: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
14. DeLancey, Scott (1997). Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology1, 33-52.
    [Google Scholar]
15. DeLancey, Scott (2001). The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics33(3), 369-382.
    [Google Scholar]
16. DeLancey, Scott (2012). Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology16(3), 529-564.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Diewald, Gabriele & ElenaSmirnova (2010). Evidentiality in German: Linguistic Realization and Regularities in Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Faller, Martina (2002). Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gisborne, Nikolas & JasperHolmes (2007). A history of English evidential verbs of appearance. English Language and Linguistics11, 1-29.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Haan, Ferdinand de (2000). Evidentality in Dutch. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 74-85.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Haan, Ferdinand de (2007). Raising as grammaticalization: the case of Germanic SEEM verbs. Rivista de Linguistica19, 129-150.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hoop, Helen de, Ad Foolen, Gijs Mulder & Veravan Mulken (2018). I think and I believe: evidential expressions in Dutch. In: A.Foolen, H.de Hoop & G.Mulder (red.). Evidence for evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 77-97.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hopper, Paul & ElisabethCloss Traugott (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Horst, Joop van der (2008). Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis. Leuven: LUP.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Janssen, Theo A.J.M. (2005). (Ad)mirativiteit in het Nederlands. Voortgang23. Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek VU, 249-260.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kaltenböck, Gunther (2014). Processibility. In: K.Aijmer & C.Rühlemann (red.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 117-142.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Koring, Loes (2012). Don’t shoot the messenger: How subjectivity affects distributional properties. Lingua122, 874-890.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Marín-Arrese, Juana I. (2013). Stancetaking and inter/subjectivity in the Iraq Inquiry: Blair vs. Brown. In: J. I.Marin-Arrese, M.Carretero, J.Arús Hita & J.van der Auwera (red.), English Modality: core, periphery and evidentiality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 411-445.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mortelmans, Tanja (2016). Indirect evidentiality in Dutch and German: a contrastive corpus study of the seem-type verbs schijnen and scheinen. Kalbotyra69, 121-152.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mortelmans, Tanja (2017). Seem-type Verbs in Dutch and German: lijken, schijnen & scheinen. In: J.I.Marín Arrese, G.Haßler & M.Carretero (red.), Evidentiality revisited. Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 123-148.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Nuyts, Jan (2000). Tensions between discourse structure and conceptual semantics: The syntax of epistemic modal expressions. Studies in Language24, 103-135.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Nuyts, Jan (2001). Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Nuyts, Jan (2012). Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction5, 53-76.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Peterson, Tyler (2016). Mirativity as surprise: Evidentiality, information, and deixis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research45, 1327-1357.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Peterson, Tyler (2017). Problematizing mirativity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics15, 312-342.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Plungian, Vladimir (2001). The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. In: P.Dendale & L.Tasmowski (red.), On Evidentiality. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 349-357.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Rett, Jessica & Sarah E.Murray (2013.) A semantic account of mirative evidentials. Proceedings of SALT23, 453-472.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Sanders, José & WilbertSpooren (1996). Subjectivity and certainty in epistemic modality: A study of Dutch epistemic modifiers. Cognitive linguistics7, 241-264.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Serrano-Losada, Mario (2017a). On English turn out and Spanish resultar mirative constructions: A case of ongoing grammaticalization? In: S.Chruschina & E. M.Remberger (red.), The rise and development of evidential and epistemic markers. Journal of Historical Linguistics7, 160-189.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Serrano-Losada, Mario (2017b). Raising turn out in Late Modern English: The rise of a mirative predicate. Review of Cognitive Linguistics15, 411-437. [Special issue on The linguistic expression of mirativity, ed. by A.Celle & A.Tsangalidis]
    [Google Scholar]
41. Squartini, Mario (2008). Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian. Linguistics46, 917-947.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Thuillier, François (2004). Synonymie et différences. Le cas de paraître et sembler. In: C.Vaguer & B.Lavieu (red.), Le verbe dans tous ses états. Grammaire, sémantique, didactique. Namur: Presses Universitaires de Namur, 161-178.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Usonienė, Aurelija & JolantaŠinkūnienė (2013). A cross-linguistic look at the multifunctionality of the English verb seem. In: J. I.Marín Arrese, M.Carretero, J. A.Hita & J.van der Auwera (red.), English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 281-316.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Vliegen, Maurice (2010). Lexikalische Evidentialität: Das niederländische ‘blijken’. Ein evidenter Fall der Grammatikalisierung. In: A.P.ten Cate, R.Rapp, J.Strässler, M.Vliegen & H.Weber (red.), Grammatik Sprache Geschichte. Tübingen: Narr, 209-216.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Vliegen, Maurice (2011a). Scheinbar identisch: Niederländisch schijnen, deutsch scheinen. In: W.Kürschner, R.Rapp, J.Strässler, M.Vliegen, & H.Weber (red.), Neue linguistische Perspektiven. Frankfurt: Lang, 231-244.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Vliegen, Maurice (2011b). Evidentiality: Dutch ‘seem’ and ‘appear’ verbs: ‘blijken’, ‘lijken’, ‘schijnen’. Linguistics in the Netherlands28, 125-137.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Vliegen, Maurice (2019). Schijnen in gesproken Belgisch en Nederlands Nederlands. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde135, 201-216.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Whitt, Richard J. (2018). Evidentiality and propositional scope in Early Modern German. Journal of Historical Pragmatics19(1), 122-149.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Wiemer, Björn (2010). Hearsay in European languages: toward an integrative account of grammatical and lexical marking. In: G.Diewald & E.Smirnova (red.), Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 59-129.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Willett, Thomas (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language12, 51-97.
    [Google Scholar]