2004
Volume 68, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0039-8691
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1214

Abstract

Abstract1

For a couple of decades now, in Flanders, the functional elaboration of what is generally called , i.e. mesolectal language use situated in between (‘tussen’) acrolectal Standard Dutch and basilectal Flemish dialects, has caused increasing concern about the position of Standard Dutch relative to other recognized ways of speaking. This has provoked intense debate about the proper characterization of this evolution. In this paper I focus on the daily language practices and overt attitudes of six girls at a Flemish secondary school to illustrate that it is relatively easy to find evidence that suggests the mentioned evolution is properly characterized as a type of destandardization. Yet by zooming in on the covert attitudes of the girls, which are influenced by the Standard Language Ideology (SLI), I will argue that a close ethnographic study of daily language use is able to go beyond the surface appearances of larger-scale ideologies and can demonstrate the continuing influence of standardization. Sociolinguistic ethnography may therefore have a vital role to play in the ongoing debate about language variation in Flanders.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TET2016.2.LANC
2016-12-01
2021-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/00398691/68/2/05_TET2016.2.LANC.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TET2016.2.LANC&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TET2016.2.LANC
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TET2016.2.LANC
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): destandardization; Dutch; Flanders; sociolinguistic ethnography; standardization; tussentaal
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error