f Kan verplicht werk voor uitkeringsgerechtigden betekenisvol werk zijn?

References

1. Bailey, C, Yeoman, R., Madden, A., Thompson, M. & Kerridge, G. (2019). A review of the empirical literature on meaningful work: Progress and research agenda. Human Resource Development Review18(1), 83-113.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bijleveld, C. (2023). Research methods for empirical legal studies. Boom.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Budd, J. (2011). The thought of work. IRL Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Carter, E., & Whitworth, A. (2017). Work activation regimes and well-being of unemployed people: rhetoric, risk and reality of quasi-marketization in the UK work programme. Social Policy & Administration, 51(5): 796-816.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (2023). StatLine: Personen met bijstand; persoonskenmerken. CBS StatLine. Geraadpleegd op 4juli2023 van https://opendata.cbs.nl/dataportaal/#/CBS/nl/dataset/82016NED/table?ts=1706356037867
   [Google Scholar]
6. Centraal Planbureau (2020). Evaluatie experimenten Participatiewet: Effecten op de uitstroom naar werk.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Charmaz, K. (2012). Constructing Grounded Theory (2e ed). Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Commissie Regulering van Werk (2020). In wat voor land willen wij werken? Naar een nieuw ontwerp voor de regulering van werk.
   [Google Scholar]
9. DejoursC., Deranty, J. P., Renault, E., & Smith, N. H. (2018). The Return of work in critical theory. Columbia University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Deranty, J. P. (2022). Post-work society as an oxymoron: Why we cannot, and should not, whish work away. European Journal of Social Theory, 25(3), 422-439.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Eleveld, A. (2019). Werken met behoud van uitkering in de Participatiewet en in de werknemersverzekeringen: Een analyse van de rechtsbescherming van de re-integrerende uitkeringsgerechtigde aan de hand van de concepten ‘exit’ en ‘voice’. Ars Aequi, 68(2), 109-120.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eleveld, A. (2020a). Welfare to-work and the republican theory of non-domination. In: A.Eleveld, T.Kampen, & J.Arts (Reds.), Welfare to work in contemporary European welfare states. Legal, sociological and philosophical perspectives on justice and domination (pp. 263-280). Policy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Eleveld, A. (2020b). Regels en macht. Rechtvaardigheid in het gemeentelijke reintegratiebeleid. In T.Kampen, M.Sebrechts, T.Knijn, & E.Tonkens (Reds.), Streng maar onrechtvaardig. De bijstand gewogen (pp. 79-95). Van Gennip.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Eleveld, A. (2020c). De gedifferentieerde basisbaan. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsrecht in Context, (4), 151-163.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Eleveld, A. (2020d, 13juli). De basisbaan is een noodgreep, het gaat om echte banen, Sociale Vraagstukken. https://www.socialevraagstukken.nl/de-basisbaan-is-een-noodgreep-het-gaat-om-echte-banen/
    [Google Scholar]
16. Eleveld, A. (2023a). Applying neo-republican theory to welfare to work practices: rules and arbitrary power in mandatory work programmes in the Netherlands. Social Policy and Society, 22(2), 267-281.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Eleveld, A. (2023b, 5september). Re-Interpreting basic values underlying social security law in times of ecological crisis. Beschikbaar op SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4562350 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4562350.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Eleveld, A. (2023c). Can mandatory in activation programmes be meaningful work? (online first), Critical Social Policy.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Elster, J. (1983). Sour grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality. Maison des Sciences de L’Homme & Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gerards, R., & Welters, R. (2023). Unemployment benefit eligibility requirements and perceived time pressure. Social Science Quarterly104(4), 907-917.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hoang, T. T. A. & Knabe, A. (2021). Time use, unemployment, and well-being: an empirical analysis using British time-use data. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22, 2525-2548.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jahoda, M. (1982). Employment and unemployment: a social-psychological analysis. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Knabe, A., Schöb, R., & Wiemann, J. (2017). The subjective well-being of workfare participants: insights for a day reconstruction Survey. Applied Economics, 49(13), 1311-1325.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Laaser, K., & Karlsson, J. (2022). Towards a sociology of work. Work Employment and Society, 36(5), 798-815.
    [Google Scholar]
25. LeBaron, G. (2015). Unfree labour beyond binaries. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 17(1), 1-19.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Léné, A. (2019). Job satisfaction and bad jobs: why are cleaners so happy at work?Work, Employment and Society, 33(4), 666-681.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse. Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Mitchell, W., & Muysken, J. (2010). Full employment abandoned: shifting sands and policy failures. International Journal of Public Policy, 5(4), 295-313.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Roessler, B. (2012). Meaningful work: arguments from autonomy. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 20(1), 71-93.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Roex, K. L. A., & Rözer, J. J. (2018). The social norm to work and the well-being of the short- and long-term unemployed. Social Indicator Research, 139, 1037-1064.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Roosma, F. (2022). A struggle for framing and interpretation: the impact of the ‘basic income experiments’ on social policy reform in the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Security, 24(3), 192-212.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91-127.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017.) Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sage, D. (2019). Unemployment, wellbeing and the power of the work ethic: implications for social policy. Critical Social Policy, 39(2), 205-228.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Sayers, S. (2005). Why work? Marx and human nature. Science & society, 69(4), 606-616.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Schmidt Hansen, L., & Herup Nielsen, M. (2023). Working less, not more in a workfare programme: Group solidarity, informal norms and alternative value systems amongst activated participants. Journal of Social Policy, 52(1), 46-62.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Tyler, I. (2020). Stigma: The machinery of inequality. Zed Books.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Strandh, M. (2001). State intervention and mental well-being among the unemployed. Journal of Social Policy, 30(1), 57-80.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sykes, C. (2023). How Australia’s employment services system fails jobseekers: Insights from self-determination theory. Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 26(1), 84-113.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Verlaat, T., Rosenkranz, S., Groot, L. F., & Sanders, M. (2021). Requirements vs. autonomy: What works in social assistance?https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3720953
    [Google Scholar]
41. Veltman, A. (2016). Meaningful work. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Veltman, A. (2022). Leisure and respect for working people. In: K.Breen, & J.Deranty (Reds.), The politics and ethics of contemporary work. Whither work? (pp. 59-71). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Watts, B., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2018). Welfare conditionality. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid (2020). Het betere werk. De nieuwe maatschappelijke opdracht.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Wolf, T., Metzing, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2019). Experienced well-being and labor market status: the role of pleasure and meaning. SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research No. 1043.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Wulfgramm, M. (2011). Can activating labour market policy offset the detrimental life satisfaction of unemployment?Socio-economic Review, 9(3), 477-501.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Whitworth, A. (2016). Neoliberal paternalism and paradoxical subjects: confusion and contradiction in UK activation policy. Critical Social Policy, 36(3), 412-431.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Yeoman, R. (2014). Meaningful work and workplace democracy: A philosophy of work and politics of meaningfulness. Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Yeoman, R. (2022). The future of meaningfulness in work, organizations and systems. In: K.Breen, & J.Deranty (Reds.) The politics and ethics of contemporary work. Whither work? (pp. 31-48). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]