2004
Volume 128, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0040-7518
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1163

Abstract

Abstract

Elections are generally viewed as a crucial aspect of modern political representation. Recently political theorists and historians have questioned this claim and are opening up the theoretical and historical understanding of representation. In this article we too question the self-evident relationship between representation and election. We do this by showing that the meaning and structure of Dutch elections shifted significantly during the long nineteenth century, and that these shifts are connected to changing views on political representation. The article claims that the (potential) dangers and corrupting practices that seemed to threaten elections at different times reflected opinions on the goal of elections and the understanding of what constituted proper representation. The eras of revolution, restoration, liberal parliamentarianism, and party politics had their distinct notions of representation and corresponding electoral systems. The history of parliamentary elections therefore shows the subjectivity and problematic nature of the relationship between election and representation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVGESCH2015.4.JONG
2015-12-01
2021-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/00407518/128/4/03_TVGESCH2015.4.JONG.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVGESCH2015.4.JONG&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TVGESCH2015.4.JONG
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TVGESCH2015.4.JONG
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): corruption; elections; history; politics; representation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error