- Home
- A-Z Publications
- Tijdschrift voor Agrarisch Recht
- Previous Issues
- Volume 85, Issue 3, 2025
Tijdschrift voor Agrarisch Recht - Volume 85, Issue 3, 2025
Volume 85, Issue 3, 2025
- Kort en bondig
-
- Artikel
-
-
-
Inschrijving als kwalificatie-eis en beschermingstool voor kavelruil
Authors: prof. mr. S.E. Bartels & prof. mr. J.W.A. RheinfeldAbstractIn this contribution, the authors discuss various private law aspects of parcel exchange, with a focus on the validity and qualification of parcel exchange agreements and the legal protection by registration of the parcel exchange agreement in the public registers. The immediate cause is a recent Supreme Court ruling that registration of the agreement is a requirement for application of the parcel exchange exemption from transfer tax.
Registration was often omitted for reasons of efficiency. However, the Supreme Court confirmed that only registered agreements count as lot exchanges within the meaning of the law, which has significant tax implications. This raises broader private law questions, such as the exact legal status of unregistered agreements and the protective effect of registration. The authors conclude that the public law embedding of parcel exchange complicates the private law embedding. A sharper legal wording could avoid legal and fiscal uncertainties.
-
-
-
-
Ook het agrarisch (concept)testament kan gaan rieken
More LessAbstractThe author discusses current case law on the ‘forgotten will’ and the ‘draft will with legal effect’. Did the testator intend the will to regulate only the relationships that existed at the time it was drawn up, and not the newly created situation? If so, the will could be set aside with Art. 4:46 Civil Code and the law of intestate succession would determine the inheritance. If the inheritance law will has not changed, but the circumstances have, Schols argues, a new will with the same content may be desirable: the confirmation will.
A draft will may result in the court intervening in inheritance law on the basis of reasonableness and fairness (Art. 6:2 paragraph 2 BW). A draft will should be prevented from taking on a legal life of its own. Notaries will pay even more attention to the draft sent and the draft testator who, if the inheritance will previously expressed in draft is no longer wanted, will preferably cancel the draft inheritance law.
-
-
-
Meertaligheid in de EU en het verschil tussen industriële en niet-grondgebonden veeteelt
More LessAbstractThe conditions that livestock manure must meet in order to be used in organic farming do not appear to be worded in the same way in all language versions of the applicable EU regulations. The French Council of State therefore asked the EU Court of Justice (ECJ) for clarification. In a judgment of 4 October 2024, the ECJ first confirmed that, in principle, all language versions have the same value. If there are differences between the language versions with regard to a provision, the provision in question must be interpreted in the light of the general scheme and purpose of the legislation of which it forms a part. Unless the wording of a provision of European Union law expressly refers to the law of the Member States for the purposes of determining its meaning and scope, the rule must be given an autonomous and uniform interpretation throughout the Union. In accordance with that assessment framework, the ECJ subsequently explained that manure from ‘factory farming’ may not be used in organic farming. The concept of ‘landless livestock production’ used, inter alia, in the Dutch version is too narrow. The ECJ further clarified that ‘factory farming’ not only refers to the animal-unfriendly way in which animals are housed, but on all conditions under which both animals and the environment are treated.
-
- Aankondigingen
-
- Artikel
-
- Rechtspraak
-
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 85 (2025)
-
Volume 84 (2024)
-
Volume 83 (2023)
-
Volume 82 (2022)
-
Volume 81 (2021)
-
Volume 80 (2020)
-
Volume 79 (2019)
-
Volume 78 (2018)
-
Volume 77 (2017)
-
Volume 76 (2016)
-
Volume 75 (2015)
-
Volume 74 (2014)
-
Volume 73 (2013)
-
Volume 72 (2012)
-
Volume 71 (2011)
-
Volume 70 (2010)
-
Volume 69 (2009)
-
Volume 68 (2008)
-
Volume 67 (2007)
-
Volume 66 (2006)
-
Volume 65 (2005)
-
Volume 64 (2004)
-
Volume 63 (2003)
-
Volume 62 (2002)
-
Volume 61 (2001)
-
Volume 60 (2000)
-
Volume 59 (1999)
-
Volume 58 (1998)
-
Volume 57 (1997)
-
Volume 56 (1996)
-
Volume 55 (1995)
-
Volume 54 (1994)
-
Volume 53 (1993)
-
Volume 52 (1992)
-
Volume 51 (1991)
-
Volume 50 (1990)
-
Volume 49 (1989)
-
Volume 48 (1988)
-
Volume 47 (1987)
-
Volume 46 (1986)
-
Volume 45 (1985)
-
Volume 44 (1984)
-
Volume 43 (1983)
-
Volume 42 (1982)
-
Volume 41 (1981)
-
Volume 40 (1980)
Most Read This Month
