- Home
- A-Z Publications
- NTT Journal for Theology and the Study of Religion
- Previous Issues
- Volume 53, Issue 3, 1999
NTT Journal for Theology and the Study of Religion - Volume 53, Issue 3, 1999
Volume 53, Issue 3, 1999
-
-
De eerste koningsinscriptie uit het oude Israël Een nieuwe visie op de Tel Dan-inscriptie
More Less1Bijbelteksten worden, behalve waar anders aangegeven, geciteerd uil de Vertaling-1951 van het Nederlands Bijbelgenootschap (afgekort NBG), de epigrafische teksten uit H. Donner & W. Röllig, Kanaanäische und Aramäische Inschriften, Wiesbaden 1962 en later (afgekort KAI). Een eerdere versie van dit artikel heeft gediend als college voor belangstellenden op een Open Dag van de Vrije Universiteit op 18 maart 1999. Ik ben de studenten van mijn college ‘Aramese teksten rond de Bijbel’, V. Drupsteen en A. Sterks, erkentelijk voor hun opmerkingen.
AbstractSince its publication by A. Biran and J. Naveh in 1995, the early Aramaic Tel Dan inscription, with its supposed connection with the coming to the Northern Israelite throne of Jehu ben Nimshi in 842 BC as described in 2 Kings 9-10, has caught the attention of Aramaic and biblical scholars alike, in spite of its very fragmentary state. Most scholars assume that it is an Aramean royal inscription, set up in Dan during a period of Aramean mastery of the place. It is argued here that the inscription is, in fact, a royal inscription of Jehu himself, written between his coming to the throne and his removal of the cult of Baal / Hadad some time afterwards. The use of the Aramaic language and the ascription of Jehu’s coming to power to the god Hadad are to be explained from the political conditions prevailing at the time and from the evident dilemmas facing a royal regicide.
-
-
-
Hans Windisch als nieuwtestamenticus aan de Leidse Universiteit (1914-1929)
By M. de JongeAbstractHans Windisch (1881-1935) was Professor of N. T. in the University of Leiden for fifteen years, after a period as Privatdozent’ at Leipzig and before professorships at Kiel and Halle. His Leiden years were very important for the development of his scholarly views and a number of influential books and articles date from this period. An analysis of Windisch’s publications in Dutch, evidence of his interaction with his Dutch colleagues (among them G.A. van den Bergh van Eysinga, a protagonist of the ‘Holland Radical School’), is essential for a beter understanding of his contribution to the international scholarly discussion.
-
-
-
Kroniek van een vriendschap Francisca van Leer en Jacob Soetendorp
Authors: M.J.H.M. Poorthuis & T.A.M. SaleminkAbstractSophie/Francisca van Leer (1892-1953) was born in a Jewish family but converted at the age of 27 to Catholicism. As a Catholic she promoted understanding of Judaism and in 1948 she started a journal De Stem van Israël (The Voice of Israel). In this first cooperation between Jews and Christians in the Netherlands, Francisca van Leer met Jacob Soetendorp (1914-1976), who worked for a Jewish newspaper and later became a prominent liberal rabbi. This essay discusses an hitherto unknown exchange of letters between them, as a valuable testimony to the very first steps in Jewish-Christian dialogue.
-
-
-
De spanning tussen voorstelling en begrip als uitdaging voor de godsdienstfilosofie
More LessAbstractThe author provides an analysis of the shifts in Hegel’s conception of the relationship between religious representation and philosophical concept in his early work. The leading question is why Hegel changed his attitude on the issue whether philosophy is capable of conceptually thinking the content of religious representation, God or the Absolute. The author argues that his interpretation of modern culture played an important role in this. As a conclusion, he tries to show that the result of this analysis is not only of historical importance, but also implies the necessity of a metaphysical (conceptual) approach of religious representations in contemporary philosophy of religion.
-
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 78 (2024)
-
Volume 77 (2023)
-
Volume 76 (2022)
-
Volume 75 (2021)
-
Volume 74 (2020)
-
Volume 73 (2019)
-
Volume 72 (2018)
-
Volume 71 (2017)
-
Volume 70 (2016)
-
Volume 69 (2015)
-
Volume 68 (2014)
-
Volume 67 (2013)
-
Volume 66 (2012)
-
Volume 65 (2011)
-
Volume 64 (2010)
-
Volume 63 (2009)
-
Volume 62 (2008)
-
Volume 61 (2007)
-
Volume 60 (2006)
-
Volume 59 (2005)
-
Volume 58 (2004)
-
Volume 57 (2003)
-
Volume 56 (2002)
-
Volume 55 (2001)
-
Volume 54 (2000)
-
Volume 53 (1999)
-
Volume 52 (1998)
-
Volume 51 (1997)
-
Volume 50 (1996)
-
Volume 49 (1995)
-
Volume 48 (1994)
-
Volume 47 (1993)
-
Volume 46 (1992)
-
Volume 45 (1991)
-
Volume 44 (1990)
-
Volume 43 (1989)
-
Volume 42 (1988)
-
Volume 41 (1987)
-
Volume 40 (1986)
-
Volume 39 (1985)
-
Volume 38 (1984)
-
Volume 37 (1983)
-
Volume 36 (1982)
-
Volume 35 (1981)
-
Volume 34 (1980)
Most Read This Month
