2004
Volume 117, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244

Samenvatting

Abstract

This paper builds on Ricoeur’s narrative theory, which points to the importance of life stories as a crucial basis for the narrative identity that human beings create for themselves, overcoming the discomfort of contingency by weaving a poetic common thread through their lives in the stories they tell about themselves. Unfortunately, this comes with the risk of self-deceit and manipulability, a challenge Ricoeur acknowledged but was never able to refute in a satisfying way. I wish to expand his narrative theory by focusing on a specific experience that helps preventing a life story from becoming arbitrary or random. It is the experience of enchantment, which – in the words of modern philosopher Jane Bennett – is both captivating and disturbing. It divides life in a ‘before’ and an ‘after’. I find illustration and corroboration of my analysis by diving into Thomas Mann’s ‘The Magic Mountain’. This literary monument was already touched upon by Ricoeur himself in ‘Time and Narrative’, but this paper follows a more idiosyncratic path. I conclude that the experience of re-enchantment combines the virtue of keeping a more critical distance (disenchantment) with an attitude of a ‘second naivety’, leading to a life story that is all but arbitrary. It is reflected, with a certain inevitability and it can therefore become the bearer of profound meaning.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW.2025.3.002.BEEC
2025-09-01
2025-12-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bennett, J. (1994) Thoreau’s Nature: Ethics, Politics, and the Wild. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett, J. (2001) The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachment, Crossings and Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Buzási, Á (2022) Paul Ricoeur and the Idea of Second Naivety. Origins, Analogues, Applications, in: Études Ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies Vol 13, NO 2.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Doyle, N., McMorrow, S. (2023) Religious and Political Dispossession. Gauchet on the Role of Ideology in Modern Desacralisation and Neo-liberal Depoliticisation, in: Iride36, pp. 105-123.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gauchet, M. (2002) Redefining the Unconscious, in: Thesis Eleven71, pp. 4-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodman, N. (1976) Languages of Art. An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lamarque, P. (2014) The Opacity of Narrative, London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mann, T. (1988), Der Zauberberg, Frankfurt am Mein: Fischer. Vertaald door Driessen, H. (1924) De Toverberg, Utrecht – Amsterdam – Antwerpen: De Arbeiderspers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Michel, J. (2004) Le Modernisme Paradoxale de Paul Ricoeur, in : Archives de, Éditions Centre Sybres (tome 67), pp. 643-57.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mikkonen, J. (2019) The (Literary)Stories of Our Lives, in: Narrative and Self-Understanding: Between Literature and Philosophy, onder redactie van Haberg, G., pp. 11-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Negel, J. (2013) Zweite Naivität: Begriffsgeschichtliche und systematische Erwägungen zu einem vielbemühten, aber selten verstandenen Konzept, in: Welt als Gabe: Hermeneutische Grenzgänge zwischen Theologie und Phänomenologie, Munster: Aschendorff Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nietzsche, F. (1884-1889) Nachgelassene Fragmente, KSA12: 7.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Parfit, D. (1986) Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ricoeur, P. (1960) La Symbolique du malParis: Aubier. Vertaald door Buchanan, E. (1969), The Symbolism of Evil, Boston: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ricoeur, P. (1979) The Function of Fiction in Shaping Reality, in : Man and World12, pp. 123–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ricoeur, P. (2017) Architecture et narrativité, in: Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 303(2)4, pp. 44-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ricoeur, P. (1982) Mimèsis et représentation, in : IIA364, Strasbourg: Université des Sciences Humaines de Strasbourg, Faculté de Philosophie, 1982, pp. 51-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ricoeur, P. (1983) Temps et récit I. L’intrigue et le récit historique, Paris: Éditions du Seuil, Points Essais.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ricoeur, P. (1986) Du texte a l›action, Paul Ricoeur. Volume 2 of Esprit. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ricoeur, P. (1988) L’identité narrative, in : Esprit, Paris (1940-), 140/141 (7/8), pp. 295–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ricoeur, P. (1990) Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ricoeur, P. (1991) L’identité narrative, in : Revue de Sciences Humaines – Tome LXXXXV -No 221, pp. 35-47.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ricoeur, P. (2008) La vie. Un récit en quête de narrateur, in : Écrits et conférences 1. Autour de la psychanalyse, Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Scott-Baumann, A. (2009) Ricoeur and The Hermeneutics of Suspicion, London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. van der Leeuw, G. (1948), Inleiding tot de phaenoenologie van den godsdienst, Haarlem: De Erven F. Bohn.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Venema, H. (2000) Paul Ricoeur on Refigurative Reading and Narrative Identity, in: Symposium, IV, 2, pp. 237-248.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. WallaceM.I. (1995), The Second Naiveté. Barth, Ricœur, and the New Yale Theology. Macon: Mercer University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wolff, E. (2013) Compétences et moyens de l’homme capable à la lumière de l’incapacité, in: Etudes Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies Vol. 4; iss. 2, pp. 50-63.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW.2025.3.002.BEEC
Loading
Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error