2004
Volume 117, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244
Preview this article:

Er is geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit artikel.
Gebruik de preview-functie

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW.2025.4.005.MEYE
2025-11-01
2025-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bloor, D. (1976) Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouk, D. (2015) How Our Days Became Numbered. Risk and the Rise of the Statistical Individual. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bouk, D. (2022) Democracy’s Data. The Hidden Stories in the U.S. Census and How to Read Them. New York, NY: MCD Picador.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Callon, M. (2007) What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In: D.MacKenzie, F.Muniesa en SiuLeung-Sea (red.) Do Economists Make Markets? On the performativity of Economists. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Didier, E. (2007) Do statistics “perform” the economy? In: D.MacKenzie, F.Muniesa en SiuLeung-Sea (red.) Do Economists Make Markets? On the performativity of Economists. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Frinault, T., Karila-Cohen, P. en Neveu, E. (2023) Qu’est-ce que l’opinion publique? Dynamiques, matérialités, conflits. Paris: Folio Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Oxford en Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Garfinkel, H. (2022) Respecifying the natural sciences as discovering sciences of practical action, I and II: doing so ethnographically by administering a schedule of contingencies in discussions with laboratory scientists and by hanging around their laboratories. In: M.Lynch en H.Garfinkel (red.) Studies of Work in the Sciences. Oxon and New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Giddens, A. (1991) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory fo Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gijsel, L., Huyse, T. en Van Hoyweghen, I. (2019) Citizen Science. Hoe burgers de wetenschap uitdagen. Kalmthout: Pelckmans Pro.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Goffman, E. (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Guala, F. (2007) How to Do Things with Experimental Economics. In: D.Mackenzie, F.Muniesa en L.Siu (red.) Do Econmists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hacking, I. (1990) The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Igo, S.E. (2007) The Averaged American. Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of Mass Public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Igo, S.E. (2011) Subjects of Persuasion: Survey Research as a Solicitous Science; or, The Public Relation of the Polls. In: C.Camic, N.Gross en M.Lamont (red.) Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Krause, M. (2021) Model cases. On canonical research objects and sites. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Latour, B. (1988) The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lezaun, J. (2007) A market of opinions: the political epistemology of focus groups, Sociological Review55, pp. 130-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lezaun, J., Muniesa, F. en Vikkelsø, S. (2013) Provocative Containment and the Drift of Social-Scientific Realism, Journal of Cultural Economy6, pp. 278-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Merton, R.K. (1968) The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. In: R.K.Merton (red.) Social Theory and Social Structure (1968 enlarged edition). New York, NY: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Merton, R.K. (1987) The focussed interview and focus groups: Continuities and discontinuities, Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, pp. 550-66.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Meyers, G. en Van Hoyweghen, I. (2015) ANT en de performatieve productie van sociale kennis. Sociologische beschrijving als interventie, Sociologos36, pp. 120-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Muniesa, F. (2014) The Provoked Economy. Economic reality and the performative turn. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Nassehi, A. (2019) Muster. Theorie der digitalen Gesellschaft. Bonn: Verlag C.H. Beck.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Porter, T.M. (1986) The rise of statistical thinking, 1820-1900. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Porter, T.M. (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Scott, J.C. (1998) Seeing Like a State. How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Simmons, D. (2015) Vital minimum: need, sciences and politics in modern France. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW.2025.4.005.MEYE
Loading
Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error