De Tractatus lezen. En waarderen | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 115, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0002-5275
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1244

Abstract

Abstract

The reception history of Wittgenstein’s displays an impressive and persistent diversity. This paper explores possible sources of that diversity and locates them in different takes on the text and its context of origin, and in different perspectives of the readers. This hermeneutics is illustrated by a comparison of two views on the importance of ethics for an understanding of the : that of Cora Diamond and the one developed by the authors in previous work.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2023.2.003.STOK
2023-05-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Balaska, M. (2019) Seeing the stove as world: Significance (Bedeutung) in the early Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, 42(1), pp. 40 – 60.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Conant, J. & Diamond, C. (2004) On reading the Tractatus resolutely, in: M.Kölbel & B.Weiss (eds), Wittgenstein’s Lasting Significance. London: Routledge, pp. 42–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Conant, J. (2005) What ethics in the Tractatus is not, in: D. Z.Phillips & M.von der Ruhr (eds.) Religion and Wittgenstein’s Legacy. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 39–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Conant, J. & Bronzo, S. (2016) Resolute readings of the Tractatus, in: H.-J.Glock & J.Hyman (eds.) A Companion to Wittgenstein. Oxford: Wiley, pp. 175–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Crippen, M. (2007) The totalitarianism of therapeutic philosophy: Reading Wittgenstein through critical theory, Essays in Philosophy, 8(1), pp. 29-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. De Mesel, B. (2015) Wittgenstein, meta-ethics and the subject matter of moral philosophy, Ethical Perspectives: Journal of the European Ethics Network, 22(1), pp. 69 – 98.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De Mesel, B. (2023) Ethiek en logica in de Tractatus. Verkenning van een analogie, Algemeen Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Wijsbegeerte, dit nummer.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Diamond, C. (2001) Ethics, imagination and the method of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, reprinted in: Crary, A. & Read, R. (eds.) The New Wittgenstein. London: Routledge, pp. 149-173.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Does, J. van der (2011) Passed over in Silence. On Wittgenstein’s Tractatus and its System. London: College Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Does, J. van der & Stokhof, M. (2020) Tractatus, application and use, Open Philosophy, 3, pp. 770–797.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Donatelli, P. (2013) Reshaping ethics after Wittgenstein, Wittgenstein-Studien, 4(1), pp. 207–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fogelin, R. J. (1987, 2nd rev. ed.) Wittgenstein. The Arguments of The Philosophers. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Friedlander, E. (2019) Logic, ethics and existence in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, in: Agam-Segal, R. & Dain, E. (eds.) Wittgenstein’s Moral Thought. London: Routledge, pp. 140–189.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldfarb, W. (2011) Das Überwinden: Anti-metaphysical readings of the Tractatus, in: Read, R. & Lavery, M. A. (eds.) Beyond the Tractatus Wars. The New Wittgenstein Debate. London: Routledge, pp. 6–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Janik, A. & Toulmin, S. (1973) Wittgenstein’s Vienna. New York: Simon & Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Klagge, J. (2022) Tractatus in Context. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Luckhardt, C.G., ed. (1979) Wittgenstein, Sources and Perspectives. Hassocks: The Harvester Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Moyal Sharrock, D. (2012) Cora Diamond and the ethical imagination, British Journal of Aesthetics, 52, pp. 223–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pihlström, S. (2019) Wittgenstein on happiness: Harmony, disharmony and antitheodicy, Philosophical Investigations, 42(1), pp. 15–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rogers, B. & Wehmeier, K. F. (2012) Tractarian first-order logic: Identity and the N-operator, The Review of Symbolic Logic, 5(4), pp. 538–573.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Søndergaard Christensen, A.-M. (2011) ‘A glorious sun and a bad person’. Wittgenstein, ethical reflection and the other, Philosophia, 39, pp. 207–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stokhof, M. (2002) World and Life as One. Ethics and Ontology in Wittgenstein’s Early Thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Stokhof, M. (2010) ‘Leven zonder hoop of vrees’: Stoïsche elementen in de conceptie van het goede leven in Wittgensteins Tractatus, Filosofie, 20(6), pp. 19–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Stokhof, M. (2018) Ethics and morality, principles and practice, Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie, Vol. 1, pp. 291-304.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wittgenstein, L. (1922, 1933 Cor. ed.) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul and Trubner.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Wittgenstein, L. (1998) Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung / Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Kritische Edition. B.McGuinness, J.Schulte (eds.), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Wittgenstein, L. & Engelmann, P. (2006) Briefe, Begegnungen, Erinnerungen. I.Somavilla (ed.), Innsbruck-Wien: Haymon Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2023.2.003.STOK
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error