2004
Volume 76, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0165-2346
  • E-ISSN: 2773-1847

Samenvatting

Reflecting on Karl Barth’s theological approach of creation in the realm of eco-theological discussions easily leads to the conclusion that Barth is defending a so-called ‘critical’ view on creation and that Barth’s contribution should be seen in warnings for a romanticizing view of nature – bearing in mind he resisted against any legitimation of creation orders. Barth’s doctrine of creation however, founded in the doctrine of election, does theologically more justice to the reality of our natural existence, even to that of animals and plants, and Barths contribution to eco-theology should be founded in the doctrine of human sin, rather than in a new theology of nature.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/KT2025.4.003.SMED
2025-09-01
2025-12-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. KarenArmstrong, De heilige natuur: Hoe we de relatie met onze natuurlijke omgeving kunnen herstellen. Amsterdam/Antwerpen: Querido2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. KarlBarth, ‘Der Christ in der Gesellschaft‘, in: Das Wort Gottes und die Theologie’, München: Chr. Kaiser Verlag1925, 33-69.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. KarlBarth, Die Kirchliche Dogmatik, München: Chr. Kaiser Verlag 1932-Zürich: Theologischer Verlag1967.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. KarlBarth, Dogmatik im Grundriss, Zollikon-Zürich: Evangelischer Verlag1947.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. E.J.Beker / K.A.Deurloo, Het begin in ons midden: Aspecten van bijbels scheppingsgeloof. Baarn: Ten Have1977.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MichaelBeintker, ‘Hamartiologie und Christologie: Die Bauformen der Sündenlehre in KD IV/1-3’, ZfdTh27/1 (2011), 39-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KarelBlei, ‘Noordmans contra Barth. inzake de schepping’, In de Waagschaal39/4 (2020).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CarolaDahmen, And it was not good anymore: The Ecofeminist Theologies of Sallie MacFague and Catherine Keller and the Dialectical Theology of K.H. Miskotte. Middelburg: Skandalon2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. WillisJenkins, ‘Karl Barth and Environmental Theology’, in: Paul T.Nimmo, Oxford Handbook of Karl Barth. Oxford: Oxford University Press2020, 594-608.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. C.van der Kooi en A.van Egmond, ‘Het beroep op scheppingsordeningen’, in: A.van Egmond, Heilzaam Geloof: Verzamelde artikelen. Kampen: Kok2001, 157-172.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chr.Link, ‘Fides Quaerens Intellectum: Die Bewegung der Theologie Barths’, TZ42 (1986), 279-302 (Separatdruck).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DennisMeadows (e.a.), Rapport van de Club van Rome: Grenzen aan de groei. Utrecht/Antwerpen: Het Spectrum1972.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. K.H.Miskotte, Uit de dagboeken 1917-1930: Samengesteld en toegelicht door E. Kuiper-Miskotte en H.H. Miskotte (Verzameld Werk dl. 4). Kampen: Kok1985.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. JürgenMoltmann, ‘Schöpfung, Bund und Herrlichkeit: Zur Diskussion über Karl Barths Schöpfungslehre‘, ZDTh3 (1987), 191-214.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Treesvan Montfoort, Groene Theologie. Middelburg: Skandalon2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. O.Noordmans, Verzamelde Werken 2, Kampen: Kok1979.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. A.Polhuis, De letters en het Woord: Karl Barth over het politieke getuigenis van de kerk. Utrecht: KokBoekencentrum / Boekscout: 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. I.J.Smedema, Grond onder de voeten: Karl Barths scheppingsleer in KD III/1 opnieuw gelezen. Zoetermeer: Boekencentrum2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. LynnWhite jr., ‘The historical roots of our ecological crisis’, Science155 (1967), 1203-1207.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/KT2025.4.003.SMED
Loading
Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error