2004
Volume 65, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0043-5414
  • E-ISSN: 1875-709X

Abstract

Abstract

The unconditional military, financial, diplomatic, economic and academic complicity of the colonial West, led by the U.S., is the main factor enabling Israel’s livestreamed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, but it is not the only one. Epistemic complicity, the obsessive amplification of Israel’s repetitive falsification of and illogical justifications for its atrocities against Palestinians – whether discursive, argumentative, or otherwise – is another. Yet another factor is the enormous influence of the special interest (lobby) groups that ensure the flow of arms and money to Israel no matter whether it serves US interests or not. But there’s another foundational factor: the entrenched shared ‘ethics’ stemming from the centuries-old history of European and Euro-American dehumanization, colonial subjugation, even extermination of non-European nations. On the other hand, millions in the West have expressed meaningful solidarity with Palestinian liberation, motivated by a planetary ethics that realizes that the most profound ethical obligation is to do no harm and to stop and repair harm done in their name. They are contributing to a counter-ethics needed to resist the monopolization of ethics and knowledge by oppressive groups and to chart a more ethical path to freedom, justice and unmitigated emancipation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/WP2025.3.004.BARG
2025-07-01
2025-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anonieme auteur (2025). In Gaza, almost every IDF platoon keeps a human shield, a sub-army of Palestinian slaves. Haaretz, 30-03-2025, bit.ly/3HW1IRw.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barghouti, O. (2006), Relative humanity: identity, rights, and ethics—Israel as a case study. PMLA, 121 (5), 1536-1543.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berger, J. (2007). Hold everything dear: dispatches on survival and resistance. New York: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blatman, D. & A.Goldberg (2025). There’s No Auschwitz in Gaza. But It’s Still Genocide. Haaretz, 30-01-2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bouteldja, H. (2016). Whites, jews, and us: toward a politics of revolutionary love. Semiotext(e).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Butler, J. (2021). The force of nonviolence. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Castro Varela, M. do Mar (2020). Fundamental education and decolonization of the mind. On Education. Journal for Research and Debate, 3(7).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Darwish, M. (2003). Unfortunately, it was paradise: selected poems. University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. De Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the south: justice against epistemicide. Boulder: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dhawan, N. (2017). Can non-Europeans philosophize? Transnational literacy and planetary ethics in a lobal age. Hypatia, 32.3, 488-505.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lorde, A. (1984). Sister Outsider. Crossing Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. OHCHR (2015). Report of the detailed findings of the independent commission of inquiry established pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution, S-21/1, June2015.
  13. OHCHR (2025). End unfolding genocide or watch it end life in Gaza. URL: http://bit.ly/3ZMeuZ6.
  14. Perugini, N. & N.Gordon (2024). A legal justification for genocide. Jewish Currents, 17July2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rokach, L. (1986). Israel’s sacred terrorism. AAUG Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Roosevelt, T. (1903). The winning of the west: an account of the exploration and settlement of our country from the Alleghanies to the Pacific. Philadelphia: Gebbie and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Spivak, G. (2004). Righting wrongs. South Atlantic Quarterly, 103 (2/3), 523–581.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wind, M. (2024). How Israeli universities and legal scholars collaborate with Israel’s military. DAWN, 14-032024. URL: https://bit.ly/43XMLXY.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wolfe, P. (2006). Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research, 8 (4), 387-409.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/WP2025.3.004.BARG
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error