2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publicaties
  3. Wijsgerig Perspectief
  4. Volume 65, Issue 3
  5. Artikel
Volume 65, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0043-5414
  • E-ISSN: 1875-709X

Samenvatting

Abstract

This essay argues that the ongoing genocide in Palestine must be understood as part of a broader historical continuum of neocolonial violence and indigenous resistance across the Middle East. It challenges hegemonic conceptual framings of genocidal violence that dominate academic and public discourse in the Global North by discussing how they obscure the structural entanglement between genocidal violence and neocolonial interventions in the region. Grounding its analysis in a perspective from the Iranian Independent Left, the essay highlights a longstanding tradition of resistance that has confronted not only imperialist and neocolonial powers but also regional ethno-religious despotisms. The essay advances three central claims. First, hegemonic frameworks of genocide rely on idealized binaries of victims and saviours, erasing the political agency of the oppressed. Second, these frameworks conceal the role of neocolonial interventions in producing and sustaining genocidal warfare. Third, dismantling these structures requires centring the ethics and politics of indigenous liberation movements across the region. The essay, rather than offering abstract solidarity, amplifies a critical voice grounded in the region’s enduring struggles and calls for a radical rethinking of how genocide, resistance, and liberation are theorized and confronted.

© Leila Faghfouri Azar en Shahin Nasiri
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/WP2025.3.005.AZAR
2025-07-01
2025-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agier, M. (2010). Humanity as an identity and its political effects (a note on camps and humanitarian government). Humanity: an international journal of human rights, humanitarianism, and development, 1(1), 29-45.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arendt, H. (2007). We refugees. In: JeromeKohn & Ron H.Feldman (red.), The Jewish writings. New York: Schocken Books, 264-74.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacra and simulations. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Dirik, D. (2022). The Kurdish women’s movement: history, theory, practice. Londen: Pluto Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Douzinas, C. (2013). The paradoxes of human rights. Constellations, 20(1), 51-67.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Faghfouri Azar, L. & S.Nasiri (2021). Paknejad’s trial: fifty years later [Defaeeyat-e Paknejad: Panjah Sal Ba’ad]. Pecritique, 16, 941-976. https://shorturl.at/GF8gF.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Mamdani, M. (2018). Citizen and subject: contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 21-22.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Mbembe, A. (2019). Necropolitics. Vert. SteveCorcoran. Durham: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Moyn, S. (2020). From aggression to atrocity: rethinking the history of international criminal law. In: KevinJon Heller et al. (red.), The Oxford handbook of public international law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 341-360.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Nasiri, S. & L.Faghfouri Azar (2022). Investigating the 1981 massacre in Iran: on the law-constituting force of violence. Journal of genocide research, 26(2), 164-187.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs. Summary of findings: costs of war project. Brown University, geraadpleegd op 13mei2025, https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/papers/summary.
/content/journals/10.5117/WP2025.3.005.AZAR
Loading
Keyword(s): Genocide; Middle East; Neocolonialism; Resistance; Victimhood

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error