2004
Volume 66, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0043-5414
  • E-ISSN: 1875-709X

Samenvatting

Abstract

This article illustrates that metamorphosis functions not only as a literary motif but also as a narrative technique: thematic metamorphoses within a narrative often require corresponding textual transformations that alter the narrative’s presentation. Although ancient Greek literature features numerous examples of (bodily) transformations, the Greek term ‘metamorphosis’ is notably absent, appearing only in Hellenistic and Roman texts, with Ovid’s being the most prominent example. In Ovid’s work, metamorphosis functions as both a cosmological principle and a poetic device: divine intervention alters the characters' bodies within the narrative, while playful word order ambiguously transforms the storytelling itself. The article challenges the inclination to view Ovid’s as the definitive model for literary metamorphoses, arguing instead that no single, unequivocal model exists. Various other models are available, two of which will be further discussed here. In Sophocles’ , metamorphosis assumes a tragic dimension: Oidipous’ status shifts through reversal and recognition, with wordplay involving (I know) and (foot) undermining his supposed superior knowledge. In Melville’s , hermeneutic metamorphosis highlights interpretative transformations, where meaning expands through subjective interpretations, culminating in the multifaceted understandings of the white whale Moby Dick. Together these three models demonstrate metamorphosis as a narrative technique that reshapes both the story and its telling.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/WP2026.1.003.BOVE
2026-02-01
2026-02-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Asclepiades van Tragilos. De stof van de tragedie [Tragōͅdoúmena]. (Oudgriekse tekst: ‘Oidipodeia’. In Greek Epic Fragments: From the Seventh to the Fifth Centuries BC. LCL 497. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003, pp. 38-42.)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Forbes Irving, P.M.C. (1990). Metamorphosis in Greek myths. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hakluyt, R. (1904). The principal navigations, voyages, traffiques and discoveries of the English nation, dl. 4. Glasgow: Meclehose and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Knox, B.M.W. (1980). Word and action: essays on the ancient theater. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Melville, H. (2018). Moby-Dick; or the whale. Third Norton Critical Edition. New York: Norton, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Münster, S. (1559). Cosmographiae universalis. (Sunderland Collectie). Basel: Henricus Petrus. https://oculi-mundi.com/munsters-monsters. Geraadpleegd op 26-12-2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Schrijvers, P. (2022). Over het vertalen van Ovidius, Metamorphosen. Athenaeum Boekhandelwww.athenaeumscheltema.nl/vertalers/2022/over-het-vertalen-van-ovidius-metamorphosen-door-piet-schrijvers. Geraadpleegd op 20-12-2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sophokles (1994). Oidipous de alleenheerser. (Oudgriekse tekst: Ajax. Electra. Oedipus Tyrannus. LCL 20. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.)
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ovidius. Metamorfosen (Oudgriekse tekst: Metamorphoses, Volume I: Books 1-8 en Volume II: Books 9-LCL 42 & 43. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1916.)
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/WP2026.1.003.BOVE
Loading
Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error