Plural inflection in varieties of Dutch | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 27, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1384-5845
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1171

Abstract

Abstract

The present study investigates the variation in the plural inflections in modern Dutch dialects, focusing on their diachronic development. The original diversity of declensional classes found in the earliest attested stage of Dutch is indirectly reflected in the varied inventory of plural morphemes in present-day dialects. The gradual confusion and merger of class-specific inflectional markers over time contributed to a reduction in the repertoire of the inherited inflectional plural exponents. With time, the distribution of plural markers tended to become increasingly determined by phonology and gender, or was guided by semantics. The aim of this study is to trace back the patterns of variation in the plural inflection across three present-day Dutch varieties to those found in the earliest attested Dutch and Low Saxon material. The research question addressed in the study is whether the contrasts found across the examined modern Dutch dialects can be directly traced back to the variation in Old Dutch and Old Saxon. The analysis of the developments in plurality patterns is framed in the context of the West Germanic linguistic continuum, allowing us to evaluate the position of Dutch on this continuum. The study reveals that the boundary between different inflectional patterns runs across the Dutch dialectal continuum, with western varieties showing more affiliation with the English plurality patterns, while eastern and southeastern dialects demonstrating a closer affiliation with German. The findings indicate as well that the early traces of this contrast are already detectable in the earliest attestations of Dutch.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2022.3.005.ADAM
2022-12-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adamczyk, Elżbieta (2018). Reshaping of the nominal inflection in early Northern West Germanic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Belemans, Rob & H. H. A.van de Wijngaard (eds.) (1995). Dialect in Beweging (Dialectenboek 3). Groesbeek: Stichting Nederlandse Dialecten.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloemhoff, Henk, HermannNiebaum, Jan NijenTwilhaar and HarrieScholtmeijer (2013). Recent evolutions in the position and structure of Low Saxon. With an excursus on the new polders in Flevoland. In: F.Hinskens & J.Taeldeman (eds.), Language and space. An international handbook of linguistic variation. Volume 3. Dutch. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 454-511.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Booij, Geert (2002). The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Braune, Wilhelm & IngoReiffenstein (2004). Althochdeutsche Grammatik I. 15th edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. van Bree, Cor (1986). De meervoudsvorming bij de Twentse substantieven vroeger en nu. Tabu16, 315-328.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. van Bree, Cor (1987). Historische grammatica van het Nederlands. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. van Bree, Cor (2013). The spectrum of spatial varieties of Dutch: The historical genesis. In: F.Hinskens & J.Taeldeman (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation. Volume 3. Dutch. Berlin: De Gruyter, 100-128.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Buccini, Anthony F. (1995). Ontstaan en vroegste ontwikkeling van het Nederlandse taallandschap. Taal en Tongval8, 8-66.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Buccini, Anthony F. (2010). Between Pre-German and Pre-English: The origin of Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics22, 301-314.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. van Coetsem, Frans (2000). A general and unified theory of the transmission process in language contact. Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dammel, Antje, SebastianKürschner & DamarisNübling (2010). Pluralallomorphie in zehn germanischen Sprachen. Konvergenzen und Divergenzen in Ausdrucksverfahren und Konditionierung. In: A.Dammel, S.Kürschner & D.Nübling (eds.), Kontrastive germanistische Linguistik. Hildesheim: Olms, 587-642.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. De Schutter, Georges, Boudewijnvan den Berg, TonGoeman & Therade Jong (2005). Morfologische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten I. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. De Schutter, Georges & Ben J. H.Hermans (2013). The Limburg dialects: Grammatical properties. In: F.Hinskens, & J.Taeldeman (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation: Dutch, Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 356-378.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Drissen, Jacques & LouisPluijmen (2012). De Vallekebergsen Dieksjenaer. Valkenburg: Stichting Vallekebergse dieksjonaer.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Franck, Johannes (1883). Mittelniederländische Grammatik: mit Lesestücken und Glossar. Leipzig: T.O. Weigel.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goeman, Antonie C.M. & WillyJongenburger. (2009). Dimensions and determinants of dialects in the Netherlands at the individual and regional levels at the end of the twentieth century. International Journal of the Sociology of Language196/197, 31-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goossens, Jan (1987). Schets van de meervoudsvorming der substantieven in de Nederlandse dialecten. Taal en Tongval39, 141-173.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Goossens, Jan (1988). Het Nederlandse taalgebied. In Gedenkboek van de eeuwfeestviering van de Koninklijke Academie voor Taal- en Letterkunde (1886–1986), Gent: Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde, 65-88.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hinskens, Frans (1996). Dialect levelling in Limburg: Structural and sociolinguistic aspects. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hinskens, Frans, CorHoppenbrouwers & JohanTaeldeman (eds.) (1993). Dialectverlies en Regiolectvorming. Taal en Tongval. Themanummer 6.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoekstra, Jarich (2001). Comparative aspects of Frisian morphology and syntax. In: H. H.Munske (ed.), Handbuch des Friesischen/Handbook of Frisian Studies. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 775-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hoekstra, Erik & Marjovan Koppen (2013). Holland and Utrecht: Morphology and syntax. In: F.Hinskens & J.Taeldeman (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation: Dutch. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 418-433.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Klein, Thomas (2003). Althochdeutsch und Altniederländisch. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik57, 19-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Klein, Thomas (2013). Zum r-Plural im Westgermanischen. NOWELE66(2), 169-196.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Krogh, Steffen (1997). Zur Entstehung des Niederländischen. In: E.Glaser, M.Schlaefer & L.Rübekeil (eds.), Grammatica ianua artium. Festschrift für Rolf Bergmann zum 60. Geburtstag. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter, 21-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kroonen, Guus (2013). Etymological dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kürschner, Sebastian (2008). Deklinationsklassen-Wandel: eine diachron-kontrastive Studie zur Entwicklung der Pluralallomorphie im Deutschen, Niederländischen, Schwedischen und Dänischen. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Van Loey, Adolphe (1976). Middelnederlandse spraakkunst. Deel I. Vormleer. Groningen: H.D. Tjeenk Willink.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Marynissen, Ann (1996). De flexie van het substantief in het 13de-eeuwse ambtelijke Middelnederlands. Een taalgeografische studie. Leuven: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. MarynissenAnn (2001). Die Flexion des Substantivs in der mittelniederländischen Amtssprache des 13. Jahrhunderts. In: K.Gärtner, G.Holtus, A.Rapp & H.Völker (eds.), Skripta, Schreiblandschaften und Standardisierungstendenzen: Urkundensprachen im Grenzbereich von Germania und Romania im 13. Und 14. Jahrhundert. Trier: Kliomedia, 659-672.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Niebaum, Hermann (2008). Het Nederduits. In: H.Bloemhoff, van der Kooi, J., Niebaum, H. W. H., & Reker, S. J. H. (eds.), Handboek Nedersaksische Taal- en Letterkunde. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum, 430-447.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Nijen Twilhaar, Jan (2003). Sallands, Twents en Achterhoeks. The Hague: Sdu.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Philippa, Marlies A. I. (1987). Noord-Zee-Germaanse ontwikkelingen. Alblasserdam: Offsetdrukkerij Kanters B.V.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. EWN: Philippa, Marlies A. I. (ed.) (2003–2009). Etymologisch woordenboek van het nederlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. http://www.etymologiebank.nl
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Pijnenburg, Willy J. J., ArendQuak & Tanneke H.Schoonheim (eds.) (2009). Oudnederlands Woordenboek <http://gtb.inl.nl>
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Le Roux, T.H. & J. J.Le Roux. (1973). Middelnederlandse Grammatika: Van Stamverwante Bodem. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Quak, Arend (1973). Das Leeuwardener Fragment der sogenannten Wachtendonkschen Psalmen. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik5, 33-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Quak, Arend (1975). Wortkonkordanz zu den altmittel- und altniederfränkischen Psalmen und Glossen. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Quak, Arend (1981). Die altmittel- und altniederfränkischen Psalmen und Glossen. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Quak, Arend (1992). Versuch einer Formenlehre des altniederländischen auf der Basis der Wachtendonckschen Psalmen. In: R. H.Bremmer & A.Quak (eds.), Zur Phonologie und Morphologie des Altniederländischen, Odense: University Press, 81-123.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Salmons, Joseph (2018). A history of German: What the past reveals about today’s language. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Sanders, Willy (1970). Der altniederländische Leidener Willeram. In: D.Hofmann & W.Sanders (eds.), Gedenkschrift für William Foerste. Köln/Wien: Böhlau, 412-423.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sanders, Willy (1974). Der Leidener Willeram. Untersuchungen zu Handschrift, Text und Sprachform. München. Wilhelm Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Schaars, Lex. 2008. Gelderland. In: H.Bloemhoff, van der Kooi, J., Niebaum, H. W. H., & Reker, S. J. H. (eds.), Handboek Nedersaksische Taal- en Letterkunde. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum, 256-269.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Tiefenbach, Heinrich (2010). Altsächsisches Handwörterbuch/A Concise Old Saxon Dictionary. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. de Vaan, Michiel A. C. (2017). The dawn of Dutch. Language contact in the Western Low Countries before 1200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Versloot, Arjen (2016). Die Endungen -os/-as und -a des Nominativ/Akkusativ Plurals der a-Stämme im Altsächsischen. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik76, 464-477.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Versloot, Arjen (2020). Streektaaldood in de Lage Landen. Taal en Tongval72(1), 7-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. de Vink, Leendert (2004). Kleine grammatica van het Katwijks. Leiden: Primavera Pers.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2022.3.005.ADAM
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2022.3.005.ADAM
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error